首页> 外文期刊>Rehabilitation Research and Practice >Content Analysis of Work Limitation, Stanford Presenteeism, and Work Instability Questionnaires Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and Item Perspective Framework
【24h】

Content Analysis of Work Limitation, Stanford Presenteeism, and Work Instability Questionnaires Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and Item Perspective Framework

机译:使用功能,残疾和健康的国际分类和项目视角框架对工作限制,斯坦福表现主义和工作不稳定问卷进行内容分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Presenteeism refers to reduced performance or productivity while at work due to health reasons. WLQ-26, SPS-6, and RA-WIS are the commonly used self-report presenteeism questionnaires. These questionnaires have acceptable psychometric properties but have not been subject to structured content analysis that would define their conceptual basis.Objective. To describe the conceptual basis of the three questionnaires using ICF and IPF and then compare the distribution and content of codes to those on the vocational rehabilitation core set.Methods. Two researchers independently linked the items of the WLQ-26, SPS-6, and RA-WIS to the ICF and IPF following the established linking rules. The percentage agreement on coding was calculated between the researchers.Results. WLQ-26 was linked to 62 ICF codes, SPS-6 was linked to 17 ICF codes, and RA-WIS was linked to 74 ICF codes. Most of these codes belonged to the activity and participation domains. All the concepts were classified by the IPF, and the most were rational appraisals within the social domain. Only 12% of codes of the core set for vocational rehabilitation were used in this study to code these questionnaires.Conclusion. The specific nature of work disability that was included in these three questionnaires was difficult to explain using ICF since many aspects of content were not confined. The core set for vocational rehabilitation covered very limited content of the WLQ-26, SPS-6, and RA-WIS.
机译:背景。表现主义是指由于健康原因而在工作中降低的绩效或生产率。 WLQ-26,SPS-6和RA-WIS是常用的自我报告出席感问卷。这些问卷具有可接受的心理计量学特性,但未经过结构化内容分析来定义其概念基础。为了描述使用ICF和IPF的三份问卷的概念基础,然后将代码的分布和内容与职业康复核心集上的代码进行比较。两名研究人员按照既定的链接规则将WLQ-26,SPS-6和RA-WIS的项目独立链接到ICF和IPF。研究人员之间计算了编码的百分比一致性。 WLQ-26被链接到62个ICF代码,SPS-6被链接到17个ICF代码,而RA-WIS被链接到74个ICF代码。这些代码大部分属于活动和参与域。所有概念均由IPF进行分类,其中大多数是在社会领域内的理性评估。本研究仅使用12%的职业康复核心代码对这些问卷进行编码。这三份问卷中包含的工作障碍的特殊性质很难用ICF来解释,因为内容的许多方面都不受限制。职业康复的核心集涵盖了WLQ-26,SPS-6和RA-WIS的非常有限的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号