首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation >Content Comparison of Worker Productivity Questionnaires in Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Conditions Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework
【24h】

Content Comparison of Worker Productivity Questionnaires in Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Conditions Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework

机译:使用功能,残障和健康框架国际分类对关节炎和肌肉骨骼疾病中工人生产率问卷的内容进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Worker productivity outcome is essential in examining the rehabilitation of workers with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions. There is great variation in the contents of worker productivity questionnaires. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) offers the possibility to serve as a reference to describe and compare the contents of these questionnaires. Methods A literature review identified published self-report worker productivity questionnaires. All meaningful concepts were identified and linked to the corresponding ICF category according to established rules. Results Eighteen questionnaires were identified which contained a total of 519 meaningful concepts and which were linked to 64 unique 2nd level ICF categories. All questionnaires addressed Activities and Participation, thirteen (72%) addressed Body Functions, seven (39%) addressed Environmental Factors, seven (39%) addressed Personal Factors and only one questionnaire (6%) for Body Structures component. Overall, Work Role Functioning (WRF) questionnaire addressed the most number of different categories while Quantity and Quality method contained only one ICF category. The Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale had the highest number of categories for Body Functions, the Work Activity Limitations Scale and WRF had the most number of categories for Activities and Participation. The Health and Labour Questionnaire had the highest number of categories referring to unpaid work participation. The Health and Work Questionnaire was the only that included contextualization of both Environmental and Personal Factors. Conclusion Self-report worker productivity questionnaires differed largely in their contents. This content analysis study could guide us in selecting an appropriate questionnaire for a specific study question.
机译:背景技术工人生产率的结果对于检查患有关节炎和其他肌肉骨骼疾病的工人的康复至关重要。工人生产率调查表的内容差异很大。 《国际功能性残疾与健康分类》(ICF)为描述和比较这些问卷的内容提供了可能。方法文献综述确定了已发表的自我报告工人生产率调查表。根据建立的规则,所有有意义的概念均已确定并链接到相应的ICF类别。结果确定了18份问卷,共包含519个有意义的概念,并与64个独特的第二级ICF类别相关联。所有调查表均针对活动和参与,十三(72%)项针对身体功能,七(39%)项针对环境因素,七(39%)项针对个人因素,而针对身体结构成分仅一项调查表(6%)。总体而言,工作角色职能(WRF)问卷涉及最多数量的不同类别,而数量和质量方法仅包含一个ICF类别。类风湿关节炎-工作不稳定性量表的身体功能类别最多,工作活动限制量表和WRF的活动和参与类别最多。卫生和劳工调查表中涉及无薪工作参与的类别数量最多。健康和工作调查表是唯一包含环境和个人因素的背景调查的调查表。结论自我报告工作者生产率问卷的内容差异很大。内容分析研究可以指导我们为特定的研究问题选择适当的问卷。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation》 |2009年第4期|382-397|共16页
  • 作者单位

    ICF Research Branch of the World Health Organization-Collaborating Center Family of International Classifications Swiss Paraplegic Research Guido A. Zach Strasse 4 6207 Nottwil Switzerland;

    ICF Research Branch of the World Health Organization-Collaborating Center Family of International Classifications Swiss Paraplegic Research Guido A. Zach Strasse 4 6207 Nottwil Switzerland;

    Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit Keenan Research Centre Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St Michael’s Hospital Toronto ON Canada;

    Department of Internal Medicine Division of Rheumatology Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Outcomes assessment; Work; Questionnaires; Arthritis; Absenteeism; Presenteeism;

    机译:结果评估;工作;问卷;关节炎;旷工;假肢;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号