Background Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue can be used to preserve the fertility of patients who are about to receive treatment(s) that could compromise their future ovarian function. Here we evaluate the effectiveness of a vitrification protocol by carrying out a systematic comparison with a conventional slow-freezing method on human ovarian tissue. Methods Human ovarian samples (mean age 28.0?±?1.1?years) were processed in parallel for each cryopreservation procedure: vitrification and slow-freezing. Following warming/thawing, histological observations and a TUNEL assay in ovarian follicles were performed and compared to unfrozen control. Results Both cryopreservation protocols gave comparable histological outcomes. Percentage of intact follicles was 83.6?% following vitrification in a 1.5?M 1,2-propanediol (PrOH), 1.5?M ethylene glycol (EG) and 0.5?M raffinose solution, 80.7?% after slow-freezing in 1.5?M PrOH and 0.025?M raffinose, and 99.6?% in fresh tissue. Follicle density was unchanged by vitrification (0.6 follicles/mm2) or slow-freezing (0.5 follicles/mm2) compared to fresh tissue (0.7 follicles/mm2). Percentage of follicles with DNA fragmentation was not statistically different in vitrified (20.8?%) or slow-frozen (31.3?%) tissues compared to the unfrozen control (35.0?%). There was no difference in proportion of stroma cells with DNA fragmentation in vitrified (6.4?%) and slow-frozen (3.7?%) tissues compared to unfrozen tissue (4.2?%). Conclusions This vitrification protocol enables good preservation of ovarian quality post-warming. The evaluation of endocrine function after vitrification need to be perform in a higher cohort to evaluate if this protocol may offer a relevant alternative to conventional slow-freezing for the cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue.
展开▼
