首页> 外文期刊>Research Ethics >Assuming vulnerability: Ethical considerations in a multiple-case study with older suicide attempters:
【24h】

Assuming vulnerability: Ethical considerations in a multiple-case study with older suicide attempters:

机译:假设易受伤害性:在针对年龄较大的自杀未遂者的多案例研究中,道德考量:

获取原文
           

摘要

In conceptualizing vulnerability, it is common for researchers to assume that some participants are more vulnerable on the basis of their membership of a particular group or because they exhibit particular characteristics. Older people are often viewed as inherently more vulnerable by ethics committees and the ethical guidelines committees construct. Because age alone does not confer or cause vulnerability, risk of harm to older research participants is not purely associated with their intrinsic connection to a vulnerable group, and classifying older research participants as vulnerable may not necessarily protect them from harm. Drawing on the preliminary findings of a qualitative study of older people who had survived a suicide attempt, we reflect on how the specific context of our study had the potential of framing older people as vulnerable, and describe ways in which these were managed and resolved. Specifically, we discuss potential for harm through the ethical principles of coercion and distress.
机译:在对脆弱性进行概念化时,研究人员通常会假设某些参与者由于其特定组的成员身份或表现出特定特征而更加脆弱。道德委员会和道德准则委员会通常会把老年人视为天生就更容易受到伤害。由于仅年龄并不会赋予或导致脆弱性,因此对老年研究参与者的伤害风险并不仅仅与他们与弱势群体的内在联系有关,将老年研究参与者归类为弱势群体不一定可以保护他们免受伤害。根据对自杀未遂而幸存的老年人进行定性研究的初步结果,我们反思了我们研究的特定背景如何将老年人视为脆弱人群,并描述了如何管理和解决这些问题。具体来说,我们通过胁迫和痛苦的道德原则讨论潜在的伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号