...
首页> 外文期刊>Renal failure. >The Role of Nafamostat Mesylate in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy among Patients at High Risk of Bleeding
【24h】

The Role of Nafamostat Mesylate in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy among Patients at High Risk of Bleeding

机译:甲磺酸萘法莫他在高出血风险患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的作用

获取原文

摘要

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has emerged as the preferred dialysis modality for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. The objectives of this retrospective study were to assess the effect of nafamostat on circuit patency of CRRT and the safety regarding bleeding complications in patients at high risk of bleeding. We conducted a retrospective study of 243 CRRT patients at high risk of bleeding. We started CRRT without anticoagulation, and nafamostat was used if hemofilter lifespan was less than 12 h. The average hemofilter lifespan was measured before and after drug infusion to evaluate the efficacy of nafamostat. The frequency and number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions were measured to assess the safety of nafamostat. Of the 243 patients, 62 (25.5%) received nafamostat. In nafamostat group, the hemofilter lifespan was lengthened from 10.2 (7.5–13.0) h to 19.8 (12.6–26.6) h after drug infusion (p 0.001). The hemofilter lifespan was 27.5 (17.5–38.2) h in anticoagulation-free group. The frequency of RBC transfusion during CRRT did not differ between the nafamostat group and the anticoagulation-free group (71% vs. 70%, p = NS). The median number of RBC units transfused per CRRT day was also not different between the two groups [0.7 (0.5–1.0) units/day vs. 0.7 (0.4–1.1) units/day; p = NS]. The use of nafamostat in patients at high risk of bleeding who require CRRT effectively lengthened the filter survival time without an increase in RBC transfusion. However, 74.5% of patients at high risk of bleeding maintained an acceptable CRRT hemofilter lifespan without circuit anticoagulation.
机译:连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)已成为急性肾损伤危重患者的首选透析方法。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估那法莫司对CRRT电路通畅的影响以及高出血风险患者出血并发症的安全性。我们对243名CRRT高出血风险患者进行了回顾性研究。我们开始CRRT时未进行抗凝治疗,如果滤血器的寿命少于12小时,则使用nafamostat。在输注药物前后,测量平均滤血器的平均寿命,以评估那法莫他的疗效。测量了红细胞(RBC)输注的频率和次数,以评估nafamostat的安全性。在243名患者中,有62名(25.5%)接受了nafamostat治疗。在那法莫他组,血液滤过器的使用寿命从药物输注后的10.2(7.5-13.0)h延长到19.8(12.6-26.6)h(p <0.001)。无抗凝治疗组的滤血器寿命为27.5(17.5–38.2)h。在那法莫司组和无抗凝组之间,CRRT期间红细胞的输血频率没有差异(71%vs. 70%,p = NS)。两组中每个CRRT日输注的RBC单位中位数也没有差异[0.7(0.5–1.0)单位/天与0.7(0.4–1.1)单位/天; p = NS]。在需要CRRT的高出血风险患者中使用nafamostat可以有效延长滤过器的生存时间,而无需增加RBC输血。但是,有高出血风险的患者中有74.5%的CRRT滤血器寿命保持可接受,而没有回路抗凝。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号