...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiologia Brasileira >Incidental irradiation of internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer: conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy versus conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy *
【24h】

Incidental irradiation of internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer: conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy versus conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy *

机译:乳腺癌内部乳腺淋巴结的偶然照射:常规二维放射治疗与保形三维放射治疗*

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate incidental irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs) through opposed tangential fields with conventional two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy techniques and to compare the results between the two techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 80 breast cancer patients in whom radiotherapy of the IMLNs was not indicated: 40 underwent 2D radiotherapy with computed tomography for dosimetric control, and 40 underwent 3D radiotherapy. The total prescribed dose was 50.0 Gy or 50.4 Gy (2.0 or 1.8 Gy/day, respectively). We reviewed all plans and defined the IMLNs following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recommendations. For the IMLNs, we analyzed the proportion of the volume that received 45 Gy, the proportion of the volume that received 25 Gy, the dose to 95% of the volume, the dose to 50% of the volume, the mean dose, the minimum dose (Dmin), and the maximum dose (Dmax). Results: Left-sided treatments predominated in the 3D cohort. There were no differences between the 2D and 3D cohorts regarding tumor stage, type of surgery (mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction), or mean delineated IMLN volume (6.8 vs. 5.9 mL; p = 0.411). Except for the Dmin, all dosimetric parameters presented higher mean values in the 3D cohort ( p < 0.05). The median Dmax in the 3D cohort was 50.34 Gy. However, the mean dose to the IMLNs was 7.93 Gy in the 2D cohort, compared with 20.64 Gy in the 3D cohort. Conclusion: Neither technique delivered enough doses to the IMLNs to achieve subclinical disease control. However, all of the dosimetric parameters were significantly higher for the 3D technique.
机译:目的:通过常规的二维(2D)或三维(3D)放射治疗技术评估通过相对切向场对内部乳腺淋巴结(IMLN)的偶然照射,并比较两种技术之间的结果。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,对80例未指示IMLNs放疗的乳腺癌患者进行了研究:40例接受了计算机X线断层摄影术进行剂量学控制的2D放射治疗,另外40例接受了3D放射治疗。总处方剂量为50.0 Gy或50.4 Gy(分别为2.0或1.8 Gy /天)。我们按照放射治疗肿瘤学小组的建议审查了所有计划并定义了IMLN。对于IMLN,我们分析了接受45 Gy的体积比例,接受25 Gy的体积比例,占体积95%的剂量,占体积50%的剂量,平均剂量,最小剂量。剂量(Dmin)和最大剂量(Dmax)。结果:在3D队列中,左侧治疗占主导地位。在2D和3D队列之间,关于肿瘤的分期,手术类型(乳房切除术,保留乳房的手术或具有立即重建的乳房切除术)或平均IMLN体积没有差异(6.8 vs. 5.9 mL; p = 0.411)。除了Dmin以外,所有剂量参数在3D队列中均显示出较高的平均值(p <0.05)。 3D队列的中值Dmax为50.34 Gy。但是,在2D队列中,IMLN的平均剂量为7.93 Gy,而在3D队列中,平均剂量为20.64 Gy。结论:两种技术均未向IMLN提供足够的剂量以实现亚临床疾病控制。但是,对于3D技术,所有剂量参数都明显更高。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号