首页> 外文期刊>Lipids in Health Disease >Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between therapy with quadruple-dose rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin combined with ezetimibe
【24h】

Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between therapy with quadruple-dose rosuvastatin and rosuvastatin combined with ezetimibe

机译:四倍剂量瑞舒伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀联合依泽替米贝治疗之间的抗炎作用和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Statins are frequently administered to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and vascular inflammation, because LDL-C and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are associated with high risk for cardiovascular events. When statins do not reduce LDL-C to desired levels in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), ezetimibe can be added or the statin dose can be increased. However, which strategy is more effective for treating patients with CAD has not been established. The present study compares anti-inflammatory effects and lipid profiles in patients with CAD and similar LDL-C levels who were treated by increasing the statin dose or by adding ezetimibe to the original rosuvastatin dose to determine the optimal treatment for such patients. Methods 46 patients with high-risk CAD and LDL-C and hs-CRP levels of >70 mg/dL and >1.0 mg/L, respectively, that were not improved by 4 weeks of rosuvastatin (2.5 mg/day) were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg (R10, n?=?24) of rosuvastatin or 2.5 mg/day of rosuvastatin combined with 10 mg/day of ezetimibe (R2.5/E10, n?=?22) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in hs-CRP. Results Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the groups. At 12 weeks, LDL-C and inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and pentraxin 3) also did not significantly differ between the two groups (LDL-C: R10 vs. R2.5/E10: -19.4?±?14.2 vs. -22.4?±?14.3 mg/dL). However, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was significantly improved in the R10, compared with R2.5/E10 group (4.6?±?5.9 vs. 0.0?±?6.7 mg/dL; p?
机译:经常给予他汀类药物以减少低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和血管炎症,因为LDL-C和高敏感性C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)与心血管事件的高风险有关。当他汀类药物不能将高危冠心病(CAD)患者的LDL-C降低至所需水平时,可以添加依泽替米贝或可以增加他汀类药物的剂量。但是,尚未建立哪种方法更有效地治疗CAD患者。本研究比较了通过增加他汀类药物剂量或在原始瑞舒伐他汀剂量中添加依泽替米贝治疗的CAD及类似LDL-C水平的患者的抗炎作用和脂质状况,以确定此类患者的最佳治疗方法。方法随机分配46名瑞舒伐他汀(2.5 mg /天)未改善4周瑞舒伐他汀(2.5 mg /天)的高危CAD,LDL-C和hs-CRP水平分别> 70 mg / dL和> 1.0 mg / L的患者接受10毫克(R10,n?=?24)瑞舒伐他汀或2.5毫克/天的瑞舒伐他汀与10毫克/天的依泽替米贝(R2.5 / E10,n?=?22)组合治疗12周。主要终点是hs-CRP的变化。结果两组之间的基线特征无明显差异。在第12周时,两组之间的LDL-C和炎症标记(hs-CRP,白介素6,肿瘤坏死因子-α和pentraxin 3)也没有显着差异(LDL-C:R10与R2.5 / E10 :-19.4±±14.2vs.-22.4±±14.3mg / dL)。然而,与R2.5 / E10组相比,R10中的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)显着改善(4.6?±?5.9 vs. 0.0?±?6.7 mg / dL; p?<?0.05) 。结论尽管瑞舒伐他汀为2.5 mg /天,但两种高剂量疗法在高危CAD患者中均以相同的LDL-C降低发挥了相似的抗炎作用。但是,R10比R2.5 / E10更有效地提高了HDL-C。试用注册UMIN000003746

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号