...
首页> 外文期刊>Life Science Journal >CHADS2 in Diabetic Patient as a Predictor of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Elective Coronary intervention
【24h】

CHADS2 in Diabetic Patient as a Predictor of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Elective Coronary intervention

机译:糖尿病患者的CHADS2作为择期冠状动脉介入治疗的对比剂诱发肾病的预测因子

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is considered to be one of the record mutual main undesirable side effects of cardiac catheterization, and is concomitant with short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. The mode of inducing disease of CIN yet is not known completely in spite of some probabilities that CIN through inducing medullary hypoxia which leads to renal tubular damage. Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of CHADS2 score in prediction of CIN in diabetic patient after elective coronary intervention. Methodology: This study was prospective cohort study conducted on 60 diabetic patients divided into two groups according CHADS2 score. All patients underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients had the following: complete blood count, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), Resting 12-lead electrocardiography, Doppler – echocardiography. Serum creatininewas assessed at baseline, 24 hours after contrast media exposure in the coronary intervention. Creatinine clearance was assessed at baseline and 24 hours after the intervention. Results: CIN developed in 8 patients ((13.3%) one patient (2.6%) in CHADS2 score (1-2) group and 7 patients (33.3%) in CHADS2 score (>3) group. There are a significant positive correlation between the incidence of CIN and CHADS2 score. Conclusion: CHADS2 score is highly sensitive in diagnosis of contrast induced nephropathy after coronary intervention rather than old complicated scoring system.
机译:造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)被认为是心脏导管插入术中相互记录的主要不良副作用之一,并伴有短期和长期的发病率和死亡率。尽管CIN通过诱导髓质缺氧而导致肾小管损伤的可能性很大,但诱导CIN疾病的方式尚不完全清楚。目的:本研究的目的是评估CHADS2评分在糖尿病患者选择性冠状动脉介入治疗后预测CIN的疗效。方法:本研究是对60位糖尿病患者进行的前瞻性队列研究,根据CHADS2评分将其分为两组。所有患者均接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。所有患者均具有以下特征:全血细胞计数,糖基化血红蛋白(HbA1C),静息12导联心电图,多普勒–超声心动图。冠状动脉介入造影剂暴露后24小时,在基线时评估血清肌酐。在基线和干预后24小时评估肌酐清除率。结果:CHADS2评分(1-2)组8例(13.3%)1例(2.6%)和CHADS2评分(> 3)7例(33.3%)CIN发生,两者之间呈显着正相关。结论:CHADS2评分对冠状动脉介入治疗后对比剂诱发的肾病的诊断高度敏感,而不是旧的复杂评分系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号