...
首页> 外文期刊>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs >Applying mixed methods in evaluation of a community prevention project: reflections on strengths and challenges:
【24h】

Applying mixed methods in evaluation of a community prevention project: reflections on strengths and challenges:

机译:在评估社区预防项目中采用混合方法:对优势和挑战的反思:

获取原文

摘要

AimsIn this study we report on experiences with applying mixed methods in an evaluation study and present reflections on strengths and challenges in this respect. What was done in order to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods? What were the main benefits? What kinds of difficulties were encountered.MethodsThe study is a case report based on the researchers’ own experiences from applying qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation in a comprehensive evaluation of a complex community prevention project.ResultsFindings from qualitative methods were used to initiate further effect evaluation (sequential integration) and to support and explain findings from the effect evaluation (simultaneous integration). The main benefits were a more nuanced and comprehensive evaluation integrated into a common evaluation report. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods presented a number of challenges, particularly in integrating the analyses and writing a common report, due to...
机译:目的在本研究中,我们报告在评估研究中应用混合方法的经验,并就此方面的优势和挑战提出思考。为了整合定性和定量方法做了什么?主要好处是什么?方法本研究是个案研究报告,是根据研究人员在定性过程评估和定量效果评估中对复杂社区预防项目的综合评估中所应用经验的总结而得出的。结果利用定性方法的发现来启动进一步的效果评估(顺序整合)并支持和解释效果评估的结果(同时整合)。主要好处是将更细微和全面的评估整合到一个通用评估报告中。定性和定量方法的集成提出了许多挑战,特别是在集成分析和编写通用报告方面,这是由于...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号