首页> 外文期刊>Law Text Culture >Thinking through the body of the law. Pheng Cheah, David Fraser and Judith Grbich (eds)
【24h】

Thinking through the body of the law. Pheng Cheah, David Fraser and Judith Grbich (eds)

机译:通过法律体系进行思考。 Peng Cheah,David Fraser和Judith Grbich(编辑)

获取原文
           

摘要

Thinking Through the Body of the Law (1996) is a pathbreaking book which should presage further works of its kind. While the essays are more diverse than coherent, there is a general attempt to supplement Critical Legal Studies, Feminist Jurisprudence and Critical Race Theories' re-conceptualisation of the Law as something other than an isolated practice of objective and impartial rules. The authors question our understanding of ethics, embodiment, the social and law/justice. In doing so they present us with an inspiring range of trajectories which call for further research. In this respect, the title of the book sets an overly ambitious agenda. The title performatively asserts that the 'thinking' that is done in this book accomplishes a 'thinking through the body of the law.' This presumes a movement involving destination and arrival; parameters which seem both an impossibility and an undesirability given the subject. To re-conceptualise ethics, embodiment and law-justice, as Patton attests in the book, requires us to find 'new fonns' (p.59) that will not be known in advance of the process nor be final in their 'specific detenninations.' (p.59)
机译:《通过法律体系思考》(1996年)是一本具有开创性的著作,应该预示进一步的著作。尽管论文的多样性比连贯性更多样化,但人们普遍试图补充批判法律研究,女性主义法学和批判种族理论对法律的重新概念化,而不是客观和公正规则的孤立实践。作者质疑我们对道德,体现,社会和法律/正义的理解。通过这样做,他们为我们提供了一系列鼓舞人心的轨迹,需要进一步研究。在这方面,这本书的标题设定了一个过于雄心勃勃的议程。标题有效地证明了本书中的“思维”是“通过法律体系的思维”。假定运动涉及目的地和到达;给定主题似乎既不可能又不希望的参数。正如巴顿在书中所证明的那样,要重新概念化道德,品格和法律公正,要求我们找到“新形式”(第59页),该形式在此过程之前是未知的,在其“特定用途”方面是最终的。” (第59页)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号