首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Medical Sciences >Plagiarism: An Egregious Form of Misconduct
【24h】

Plagiarism: An Egregious Form of Misconduct

机译:gi窃:行为不端的卑鄙行为

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Publishing research papers for academic fraternity has become important for career advancement and promotion. Number of publications in peer reviewed journals and subsequent citations are recognized as measures of scientific success. Non-publishing academicians and researchers are invisible to the scientific community.Discussion:With pressure to publish, misconduct has crept into scientific writing with the result that research misconduct, plagiarism, misappropriation of intellectual property, and substantial unattributed textual copying of another's publication have become common. The Office of Research Integrity, USA, defines research misconduct as “fabrication, falsification or plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.” Although plagiarism is difficult to define in few words, it can be viewed as the stealing of another person's ideas, methods, results, or words without giving proper attribution. The Office of Research Integrity defines plagiarism as being “theft or misappropriation of intellectual property and the substantial unattributed textual copying of another's work.” Plagiarism is one of the most vehemently derided breaches of research integrity as it undermines the original and honest contribution to an existing body of knowledge.Conclusion:Plagiarism has many forms viz. blatant plagiarism, technical plagiarism, patchwork plagiarism, and self-plagiarism. In any form, the plagiarism is a threat to the research integrity and is unacceptable. We do need to detect such acts and effectively prosecute the offenders.
机译:背景:发表有关学术界的研究论文对于职业发展和晋升至关重要。同行评审期刊及其后引用文献中的出版物数量被认为是衡量科学成功与否的标准。未出版的院士和研究人员在科学界是不可见的。共同。美国研究诚信办公室将研究不端行为定义为“在提出,进行或审查研究或报告研究结果时捏造,篡改或窃。”尽管窃很难用几句话来定义,但可以将其视为在没有给出适当归因的情况下窃取他人的思想,方法,结果或词语。研究诚信办公室将窃定义为“盗窃或盗用知识产权以及他人作品的大量未经鉴定的文字复制。” gi窃是对研究完整性最强烈的嘲笑之一,因为它破坏了对现有知识体系的原始和诚实的贡献。结论:P窃具有多种形式。公然窃,技术technical窃,拼凑work窃和自我-窃。无论如何,窃都是对研究完整性的威胁,是不可接受的。我们确实需要侦查此类行为并有效起诉罪犯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号