首页> 外文期刊>Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy >Autonomy and street-level bureaucrats’ coping strategies
【24h】

Autonomy and street-level bureaucrats’ coping strategies

机译:自治和街头官僚的应对策略

获取原文
           

摘要

Frontline practitioners like teachers in public-sector education systems are not policy takers but policy makers, according to Michael Lipsky's seminal treatise Street-Level Bureaucracy , first published in 1980. They make policy by using their wide autonomy to adopt coping mechanisms , such as limiting client demand and creaming (cherry-picking). Winter and Nielsen have developed this into (1) reducing demand for output, (2) rationing output and (3) automating output. These distinctions are briefly clarified in the article. Do they have relevance for school systems and other Nordic public-sector frontline activities? The question is raised but left to upcoming research to clarify.
机译:根据迈克尔·利普斯基(Michael Lipsky)于1980年首次发表的具有开创性的论文《街头官僚制》,公共部门教育系统中的前线从业者(例如教师)不是政策制定者,而是政策制定者。他们通过广泛的自治权制定政策。 应对机制,例如限制客户需求和奶油(樱桃采摘)。温特(Winter)和尼尔森(Nielsen)已将其发展为(1)减少对产量的需求,(2)定量分配产量和(3)自动化产量。在本文中简要阐明了这些区别。它们与学校系统和其他北欧公共部门一线活动是否相关?提出了这个问题,但有待于即将进行的研究加以澄清。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号