首页> 外文期刊>New Media and Mass Communication >Science, Nano-Science and Nano-Technology Content in Nigeria’s Elite and Popular Press: Focus on Framing and Socio-political Involvement
【24h】

Science, Nano-Science and Nano-Technology Content in Nigeria’s Elite and Popular Press: Focus on Framing and Socio-political Involvement

机译:尼日利亚精英和大众媒体中的科学,纳米科学和纳米技术内容:关注框架和社会政治参与

获取原文
       

摘要

In Nigeria, there appears to be a gross paucity of research data on press framing of science. Moreover, we do not know how the print media frame nano-science and nano-technology which tend to hold some promise for Third World development. Neither do we know the extent of social inclusion nor the depth of political engagement in the communication of science and technology in the Nigerian press. This study investigates the extent to which science and nano-science are framed in one elite ( The Guardian ) and two popular newspapers ( Daily Trust and Leadership ); and if there is a significant difference in framing. It adopts the content analysis research technique involving a selection of newspapers between January 1 and December 31, 2012: the year Nigeria revised its Science and Technology Policy. Results indicate that: there is a near absence of nano-science content in the analysed papers while the coverage of other science issues abounds. Where it occurs at all, nano-science is framed as an emerging field. Frames dealing with risk/controversy, socio-economic implications, or safety/ethics rarely occur. Health/medicine, ICT, biotechnology, and high-tech issues are covered more than other science issues. Political actors, lay people, NGOs, corporations and community leaders are not significantly included in the coverage as are science publishers, scientists, the media, and government agencies. These findings have several implications for science journalism practice and development in Nigeria.
机译:在尼日利亚,关于科学新闻界的研究数据似乎很少。此外,我们还不知道印刷媒体如何构成纳米科学和纳米技术,它们往往对第三世界的发展抱有希望。我们既不了解尼日利亚新闻界的社会包容程度,也不了解政治参与科学和技术传播的深度。这项研究调查了一种精英(《卫报》)和两种流行的报纸(《每日信任》和《领导力》)对科学和纳米科学的界定程度;以及构图是否有显着差异。它采用了内容分析研究技术,该技术涉及2012年1月1日至12月31日(尼日利亚修订其科学和技术政策的那一年)的精选报纸。结果表明:在分析的论文中几乎没有纳米科学的内容,而其他科学问题的报道却很多。无论发生什么,纳米科学都被视为新兴领域。处理风险/争议,社会经济影响或安全/道德的框架很少出现。与其他科学问题相比,对健康/医学,ICT,生物技术和高科技问题的报道更多。政治参与者,非专业人士,非政府组织,公司和社区领导人并未像科学出版商,科学家,媒体和政府机构那样被大量纳入。这些发现对尼日利亚的科学新闻实践和发展有若干启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号