...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Selecting score types for longitudinal evaluations: the responsiveness of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers in children with developmental disabilities
【24h】

Selecting score types for longitudinal evaluations: the responsiveness of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers in children with developmental disabilities

机译:选择评分类型进行纵向评估:发育障碍儿童的婴幼儿综合发育量表的反应能力

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the responsiveness of the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infants and Toddlers (CDIIT) in children with developmental disabilities (DD). Methods: The responsiveness of a measure is its ability to detect change over time, and it is fundamental to an outcome measure for detecting changes over time. We compared the responsiveness of four types of scores (ie, raw scores, developmental ages [DAs], percentile ranks [PRs], and developmental quotients [DQs]) in the five subtests of the CDIIT. The CDIIT was administrated three times at intervals of 3?months on 32 children with DD aged between 5?months and 64?months (mean =30.6, standard deviation [SD] =17.8). The CDIIT is a pediatric norm-referenced assessment commonly used for clinical diagnosis of developmental delays in five developmental areas: cognition, language, motor, social, and self-care skills. The responsiveness was analyzed using three methods: effect size, standardized response mean, and paired t -test. Results: The effect size results showed that at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups, responsiveness was small or moderate in the raw scores and DAs of most of the subtest scores of the CDIIT, but the level of responsiveness varied in the PRs and DQs. The standardized response mean results of the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups showed that most of the subtest scores of the CDIIT had respectively moderate and large responsiveness in raw scores and DAs, but the responsiveness varied (from no to large) in PRs and DQs. Conclusion: The findings generally support the use of the CDIIT as an outcome measure. We also suggest using the raw scores and DAs when using a norm-referenced pediatric developmental assessment to evaluate developmental changes and program effectiveness in children with DD.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是检查发育障碍儿童(DD)的婴幼儿综合发展清单(CDIIT)的反应能力。方法:一项措施的响应能力是它检测随时间变化的能力,它是用于检测随时间变化的结果度量的基础。我们在CDIIT的五个子测验中比较了四种类型的分数(即原始分数,发育年龄[DAs],百分等级[PRs]和发育商[DQs])的响应能力。对32例DD在5月至64月之间的DD儿童,每3个月间隔3个月进行一次CDIIT(平均= 30.6,标准差[SD] = 17.8)。 CDIIT是一种儿科规范参考评估,通常用于以下五个发展领域的临床诊断:发育迟缓:认知,语言,运动,社交和自我保健技能。使用三种方法分析响应度:效应大小,标准化响应均值和配对t检验。结果:效果量结果显示,在3个月和6个月的随访中,大多数CDIIT子测验分数的原始分数和DA的响应度均小或中等,而在CDIIT的大多数子测验分数中,响应度却有所不同。 PR和DQ。 3个月和6个月随访的标准化应答均值结果表明,CDIIT的大多数子测验分数在原始分数和DA中分别具有中等和较大的响应度,但是在CIDIT中,响应度有所不同(从无到大)。 PR和DQ。结论:这些发现总体上支持使用CDIIT作为结果指标。我们还建议在使用参照标准的小儿发育评估来评估DD儿童的发育变化和计划有效性时,使用原始分数和DA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号