...
首页> 外文期刊>Neural regeneration research >Is it necessary to use the entire root as a donor when transferring contralateral C7 nerve to repair median nerve?
【24h】

Is it necessary to use the entire root as a donor when transferring contralateral C7 nerve to repair median nerve?

机译:转移对侧C7神经修复正中神经时是否有必要使用整个根作为供体?

获取原文
           

摘要

If a partial contralateral C7 nerve is transferred to a recipient injured nerve, results are not satisfactory. However, if an entire contralateral C7 nerve is used to repair two nerves, both recipient nerves show good recovery. These findings seem contradictory, as the above two methods use the same donor nerve, only the cutting method of the contralateral C7 nerve is different. To verify whether this can actually result in different repair effects, we divided rats with right total brachial plexus injury into three groups. In the entire root group, the entire contralateral C7 root was transected and transferred to the median nerve of the affected limb. In the posterior division group, only the posterior division of the contralateral C7 root was transected and transferred to the median nerve. In the entire root + posterior division group, the entire contralateral C7 root was transected but only the posterior division was transferred to the median nerve. After neurectomy, the median nerve was repaired on the affected side in the three groups. At 8, 12, and 16 weeks postoperatively, electrophysiological examination showed that maximum amplitude, latency, muscle tetanic contraction force, and muscle fiber cross-sectional area of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle were significantly better in the entire root and entire root + posterior division groups than in the posterior division group. No significant difference was found between the entire root and entire root + posterior division groups. Counts of myelinated axons in the median nerve were greater in the entire root group than in the entire root + posterior division group, which were greater than the posterior division group. We conclude that for the same recipient nerve, harvesting of the entire contralateral C7 root achieved significantly better recovery than partial harvesting, even if only part of the entire root was used for transfer. This result indicates that the entire root should be used as a donor when transferring contralateral C7 nerve.
机译:如果将对侧C 7 对侧神经转移到受者受伤的神经上,结果将不令人满意。但是,如果使用整个对侧C 7 神经修复两条神经,则两条受者神经都显示出良好的恢复。这些发现似乎是矛盾的,因为上述两种方法使用相同的供体神经,仅对侧C 7 神经的切割方法不同。为了验证这是否能真正导致不同的修复效果,我们将右臂总神经丛损伤的大鼠分为三组。在整个根组中,将整个对侧C 7 根横切并转移到患肢的正中神经。在后除组中,仅切断对侧C 7 根的后除并转移至正中神经。在整个根+后部切开组中,整个对侧C 7 根均被切开,但仅后部切开被转移到正中神经。神经切除后,三组患侧的正中神经已修复。术后第8、12和16周,电生理检查显示,在整个根部和整个根部+后部划分中,趾浅屈肌的最大振幅,潜伏期,肌肉强直收缩力和肌纤维横截面积均显着改善。组要​​比后组多。在整个根和整个根+后部分割组之间没有发现显着差异。整个根组中正中神经的髓鞘轴突的数量大于整个根+后区组的数量,后者大于后区组。我们得出结论,对于相同的受者神经,即使仅使用部分整个根进行转移,完整对侧C 7 根的收获也比部分收获要好得多。结果表明,在转移对侧C 7 神经时,应将整个根用作供体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号