首页> 外文期刊>NeoBiota >Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in quantitative pest risk assessments; practical rules for risk assessors
【24h】

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in quantitative pest risk assessments; practical rules for risk assessors

机译:定量有害生物风险评估中的不确定性和敏感性分析;风险评估师实用规则

获取原文
       

摘要

Quantitative models have several advantages compared to qualitative methods for pest risk assessments (PRA). Quantitative models do not require the definition of categorical ratings and can be used to compute numerical probabilities of entry and establishment, and to quantify spread and impact. These models are powerful tools, but they include several sources of uncertainty that need to be taken into account by risk assessors and communicated to decision makers. Uncertainty analysis (UA) and sensitivity analysis (SA) are useful for analyzing uncertainty in models used in PRA, and are becoming more popular. However, these techniques should be applied with caution because several factors may influence their results. In this paper, a brief overview of methods of UA and SA are given. As well, a series of practical rules are defined that can be followed by risk assessors to improve the reliability of UA and SA results. These rules are illustrated in a case study based on the infection model of Magarey et al. (2005) where the results of UA and SA are shown to be highly dependent on the assumptions made on the probability distribution of the model inputs.
机译:与用于虫害风险评估的定性方法相比,定量模型具有多个优势。定量模型不需要分类等级的定义,可用于计算进入和建立的数字概率,以及量化传播和影响。这些模型是功能强大的工具,但它们包括不确定性来源,风险评估者需要考虑这些不确定性并将其传达给决策者。不确定性分析(UA)和敏感性分析(SA)可用于分析PRA中使用的模型中的不确定性,并且变得越来越流行。但是,应谨慎使用这些技术,因为有几个因素可能会影响其结果。在本文中,简要概述了UA和SA的方法。同样,定义了一系列实用规则,风险评估人员可以遵循这些规则以提高UA和SA结果的可靠性。在基于Magarey等人的感染模型的案例研究中说明了这些规则。 (2005年),其中UA和SA的结果高度依赖于对模型输入的概率分布所作的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号