...
首页> 外文期刊>Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences >A comparison of Trachway intubating stylet and Airway Scope for tracheal intubation by novice operators: A manikin study
【24h】

A comparison of Trachway intubating stylet and Airway Scope for tracheal intubation by novice operators: A manikin study

机译:新手操作者比较气管插管管心针和气管插管范围的比较:人体模型研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Trachway is a recently developed intubation device that resembles an illuminating stylet and incorporates a video-assisted system. This study evaluated the use of this system for tracheal intubation by novice operators. This randomized cross-over study compared the Trachway and the Airway Scope in simulated routine and difficult intubation scenarios. The difficult scenario was simulated by increasing the tongue volume of the manikin. The primary outcome measure in both airway scenarios was the time required for a successful tracheal intubation. For each scenario, the success rate, ease of intubation and operator preference were recorded for the two devices and compared. Average intubation time did not differ significantly between the Trachway and Airway Scope for the normal airway scenario (11.2?±?6.5 vs. 9.8?±?4.3 seconds, respectively; p ?=?0.07), but was significantly longer using the Trachway than with the Airway Scope on the difficult airway scenario (17.1?±?11.1 vs. 9.5?±?4.1 seconds, respectively; p ?
机译:Trachway是最近开发的一种插管设备,类似于照明探针,并集成了视频辅助系统。这项研究评估了新手操作者使用该系统进行气管插管的情况。这项随机交叉研究比较了模拟例行和困难插管情况下的气管镜和气管镜。通过增加人体模型的舌头体积来模拟困难的情况。两种气道情况下的主要结局指标是成功气管插管所需的时间。对于每种情况,都记录并比较了两种设备的成功率,插管的难易程度和操作员的偏爱。在正常气道情况下,气道镜和气道镜的平均插管时间没有显着差异(分别为11.2±6.5和9.8±4.3秒; p = 0.07),但使用气管的时间明显长于在困难的气道情况下使用气道镜(分别为17.1±0.11秒和9.5±4.1秒; p≤0.001)。 Trachway和Airway Scope的总体成功率(分别为96.3%和98.6%)没有显着差异(p = 0.13)。在这两种情况下,尤其是在困难的气道情况下,对气道范围的偏好都更大(p <0.001)。尽管该设备在正常情况下的易用性和插管时间方面具有可比性,但Airway Scope的易用性使其更适合在插管困难情况下经验不足的操作人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号