首页> 外文期刊>Nature environment and pollution technology >Comparison to Supervised Classification Modelling in Land Use Cover Using Landsat 8 OLI Data: An Example in Miyun County of North China
【24h】

Comparison to Supervised Classification Modelling in Land Use Cover Using Landsat 8 OLI Data: An Example in Miyun County of North China

机译:使用Landsat 8 OLI数据进行土地利用覆盖的监督分类建模的比较:以华北密云县为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Land use cover (LUC) classification is one of the most important applications of optical remotely senseddata, while LUC mapping outcomes are used for global, local mapping, ecosystem assessment andenvironmental process monitoring. Hence, in this study, in order to evaluate the advantages and drawbacksof supervised classification schemes, the paper chose the optical image data of Landsat 8 OLI in Miyuncounty to test supervised classification and introduced Parallelepiped Method (PM), Minimum Distance(MD), Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) to improve classificationaccuracy of LUC mapping and to obtain the reliable LUC distribution. The four classified images reveal thatthe study area is dominated by considerable areas of forest land, with the overall accuracy found to be87.89% (kappa = 0.8524) using SVMs, 85.26% (kappa = 0.8205) using MLC, 82.11% (kappa = 0.7813)using MD, and 74.74% (kappa = 0.6920) using PM. Based on the overall accuracy and kappa statistics,SVMs might be the first option in terms of classification accuracy without taking into account of the timecostly and standard PC and laptops. MLC was the second accurate model classifiers from the classifiedimage, which was always used to obtain LUC map information for economic potential in time and cost; and PMhas shown the lowest overall classification accuracy with greater omission errors and commission errors.
机译:土地利用覆盖(LUC)分类是光学遥感数据最重要的应用之一,而LUC映射结果用于全局,局部映射,生态系统评估和环境过程监控。因此,在这项研究中,为了评估监督分类方案的优缺点,本文选择密云县Landsat 8 OLI的光学图像数据进行监督分类测试,并介绍了平行六面体方法(PM),最小距离(MD),最大值似然分类器(MLC)和支持向量机(SVM)可以提高LUC映射的分类准确性并获得可靠的LUC分布。四个分类图像显示,研究区域被相当大的林地面积所控制,使用SVM的总体准确度为87.89%(kappa = 0.8524),使用MLC的整体准确性为85.26%(kappa = 0.8205),为82.11%(kappa =使用MD的平均压力为0.7813),使用PM的平均比例为74.74%(kappa = 0.6920)。基于总体准确性和kappa统计数据,就分类准确性而言,SVM可能是首选,而无需考虑费时的以及标准的PC和笔记本电脑。 MLC是分类图像中的第二个准确的模型分类器,通常用于获取LUC地图信息,以节省时间和成本。 PM的总体分类准确度最低,而遗漏误差和佣金误差更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号