首页> 外文期刊>Nae more, journal of marine sciences >Legal aspect on contract of carriage with particular reference to the carrier's liability for physical integrity of passengers
【24h】

Legal aspect on contract of carriage with particular reference to the carrier's liability for physical integrity of passengers

机译:运输合同的法律方面,特别涉及承运人对旅客身体完整性的责任

获取原文
           

摘要

The author deals with legal aspect on contract of carriage and the carrier's liability for physical integrity of passengers. All conventions regulating this matter have been stated in chronological order. There have been analysed the similarities and differences concerning the basis and limits of the carrier's liability beginning with Brussels Convention, 1961.; Athens Convention, 1974. relating to the carriage of passengers and their luggage by sea which has been modified by the Protocols 1976. and 1990. up to Athens Convention, 2002. The limit of the carrier's liability was increased considerably by the Protocol 1976. and 1990. However, some countries required further increase referring to Montreal Convention, 1999. which specifies unlimited liability for death and passengers injuries in the air transport. Athens Convention Protocol, 2002. increases considerably the limits of the carrier's liability even enabling the countries national statutes to specify bigger amounts than those stated by the Protocol. The Protocol also modifies the basis of the carrier's liability and introduces two-level system of liability. The author suggests accepting the principle of liability, as existed in other branches of transportation law, and so predicting the carrier's genuine liability for physical integrity of passengers concerning damages caused by marine casualties for damages not caused by marine casualties. The Protocol contains the principle of liability specified by Athens Convention, 1974. Regarding significant increase of the carrier's limits of liability by the Protocol, 2002., it is questionable whether this Protocol will be accepted by the majority of countries, regardless its entering into force is not doubtful, provided that it will be ratified by the European Union.
机译:作者论述了运输合同的法律方面以及承运人对旅客身体完整性的责任。所有规范此事的惯例均按时间顺序列出。从1961年《布鲁塞尔公约》开始,已经分析了关于承运人赔偿责任的基础和限额的异同。 1974年《雅典公约》。关于海上乘船运输旅客和行李的行为,已被1976年和1990年的议定书修改,直至2002年雅典公约。1976年的议定书大大提高了承运人的赔偿责任限额。 1990年。但是,某些国家需要进一步增加参考1999年蒙特利尔公约,该公约规定了航空运输中死亡和乘客受伤的无限责任。 2002年《雅典公约议定书》大大提高了承运人的赔偿责任限额,甚至使该国的国家法规规定了比该议定书规定的金额更大的金额。该议定书还修改了承运人赔偿责任的依据,并引入了两级赔偿责任制度。作者建议接受运输法其他分支机构中存在的责任原则,并由此预测承运人对于由海上人员伤亡造成的损害而不是由海上人员伤亡造成的损害的旅客身体完整性的真正责任。该议定书载有1974年《雅典公约》规定的赔偿责任原则。关于2002年该议定书大大增加了承运人的赔偿责任限额,无论该议定书是否生效,大多数国家是否会接受该议定书令人怀疑。毫无疑问,只要它会得到欧盟的批准即可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号