首页> 外文期刊>Museum and Society >Bruce Altshuler, ed. Collecting the New: Museums and Contemporary Art
【24h】

Bruce Altshuler, ed. Collecting the New: Museums and Contemporary Art

机译:布鲁斯·阿尔舒勒(Bruce Altshuler)编辑。收集新事物:博物馆与当代艺术

获取原文
           

摘要

With its title implying wild excitement or a raving madness, The Delirious Museum: A Journey fromthe Louvre to Las Vegas prepares us for a re-appraisal of the museum. And indeed, the issuesfamiliar to museological discourse are less relevant to Calum Storrie than the museum's 'messyvitality' and 'richness of meaning' (p. 3).Storrie argues that the 'delirious' museum runs parallel to its traditional, or rationalcounterpart. In giving definition to the delirious museum, he aims to subvert the association of themuseum with order and classification. The need for subversion arises because 'neutral taxonomicsystems?-used as a means of "clarification" and education' often 'has meant limiting, either byaccident or design, the possible interpretations of the museum' (p. 2). This is a valid proposition.The model of the traditional museum has evolved from discourse which locates museums withinthe parameters of the 'rational' based on their nineteenth-century legacy in the construction ofhistory, and deterministic and patriarchal assumptions about cultural identity. The twenty-firstcentury museum is thus understood through its past emergence in colonial ambitions, based ontaxonomies and classifications that disavowed previous schemas as irrational.Storrie presents his argument through reference to a range of exhibitions, events, andarchitectural spaces that he classifies as 'delirious'. In keeping with its subject matter the bookhas a fairly labyrinthine, though not unwieldy structure that he describes as, 'neither purearchitectural analysis, nor urbanism, nor history nor literature alone; instead it weaves theseforms together.' He goes on: 'Perhaps the book itself is a Delirious Museum mimicking what itdescribes, for it is, among other things, a repository of anecdotes and arcane facts. It is mycollection' (p. 4).
机译:The Delirious Museum:从卢浮宫到拉斯维加斯的旅程,寓意着狂野的狂热或疯狂的疯狂,这为我们重新评估博物馆做好了准备。确实,与博物馆的话语相关的问题与卡卢姆·斯托里(Calum Storrie)的关系不如博物馆的``杂乱无章''和``意义丰富''(p.3)。斯托里认为,``精神错乱的''博物馆与传统博物馆或理性博物馆平行。他在给错落有致的博物馆提供定义时,旨在颠覆博物馆与秩序和分类的联系。颠覆的需求之所以出现,是因为“中性分类系统”被用作“澄清”和教育的手段,“通常意味着通过意外或设计限制博物馆的可能解释”(第2页)。这是一个正确的命题。传统博物馆的模式是从话语演变而来的,这种话语将博物馆定位在“理性”的参数之内,而理性则是基于其19世纪在历史建构中的确定性以及关于文化身份的确定性和父权性假设。因此,二十世纪的博物馆通过其过去在殖民野心中的出现而被理解,该分类基于分类学和分类,这些分类法否认了先前的图式是非理性的。 。为了与主题保持一致,这本书具有相当迷宫的结构,尽管不是笨拙的结构,他将其描述为:“既不是纯粹的建筑分析,也不是城市主义,也不是历史或文学。而是将这些形式编织在一起。”他继续说:“也许这本书本身就是一个模仿博物馆的模仿博物馆,因为它尤其是一个轶事和奥秘事实的资料库。这是我的收藏”(第4页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号