首页> 外文期刊>Korean Circulation Journal >Accuracy of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis measured by echocardiography : Compared with operative mitral valve area
【24h】

Accuracy of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis measured by echocardiography : Compared with operative mitral valve area

机译:超声心动图测量二尖瓣狭窄患者二尖瓣面积的准确性:与手术二尖瓣面积的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Measurement of echocardiographic mitral valve area (MVA) is an useful noninvasive method of estimating the stenotic mitral valve area. This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of echocardiographic MVA measurement by comparing MVAs measured by the planimetric and pressure half-time method versus direct MVA measurement by using a cone shaped device specifically made for direct measurement of MVA. Methods and Results The study population consisted of 22 consecutive patients from August 1993 to February 1996. All the patients underwent 2D planimetry and Doppler echocardiographic MVA measurement before and after valve replacement surgery ; direct measurement also was performed after surgery. Five patients (22.7%) had normal sinus rhythm, and the rest of the patients had atrial fibrillation. Two-dimensional echocardiographic examinations were attempted in 22 patients, and adequate measurements were obtained in 21 of the patients studied. Mean mitral valve area were 0.99±0.32cm (2) ranged from 0.42 to 1.68cm (2) on 2D planimetry method, 0.93±0.32cm (2) ranged from 0.42 to 1.68cm (2) on Doppler pressure half-time method, 1.17±0.20cm (2) ranged from 0.93 to1.68cm (2) on direct measurement of mitral valve area after surgery. 2D planimetry method (r=0.621, p=0.003, SE=0.165), pressure half-time method (r=0.454, p=0.003, SE=0.187), and transmitral peak velocity (r=-0.480, p=0.026, SE=0.189) was relatively well correlate with operative mitral valve area. There was relatively good agreement between direct and 2D planimetric measurement and between direct and Dopler pressure-half time method. Conclusion 2D planimetry and Doppler pressure half-time method on echocardiography are useful, noninvasive measurement method in patients with mitral stenosis.
机译:背景超声心动图二尖瓣面积(MVA)的测量是一种有用的非侵入性方法,估计狭窄的二尖瓣面积。这项研究旨在通过比较通过平面测压和压力半时法测量的MVA与使用专门为直接测量MVA的锥形设备进行的直接MVA测量来比较超声心动图MVA测量的准确性。方法和结果从1993年8月至1996年2月,该研究人群包括22例患者。所有患者均在瓣膜置换术前后进行了2D平面测量和多普勒超声心动图MVA测量;手术后也进行直接测量。五例患者(22.7%)的窦性心律正常,其余患者房颤。尝试对22例患者进行二维超声心动图检查,并对21例患者进行了足够的测量。在2D平面测量法中,平均二尖瓣面积为0.99±0.32cm(2),范围从0.42至1.68cm(2),在多普勒半压法中为0.93±0.32cm(2),范围从0.42至1.68cm(2),手术后直接测量二尖瓣面积的1.17±0.20cm(2)为0.93至1.68cm(2)。二维平面法(r = 0.621,p = 0.003,SE = 0.165),压力半衰期方法(r = 0.454,​​p = 0.003,SE = 0.187)和透射峰值速度(r = -0.480,p = 0.026, SE = 0.189)与手术二尖瓣面积相关性相对较好。直接和二维平面测量之间以及直接和多普勒半按时间方法之间有相对较好的一致性。结论超声心动图上的二维平面测量法和多普勒半压法是二尖瓣狭窄患者的一种有用的无创测量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号