首页> 外文期刊>Kinesiologia Slovenica >?uker Dragutin, Grgantov Zoran, Mili? Mirjana - INTRARATER AND INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF THE SPIKING EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT IN TOP MEN'S VOLLEYBALL
【24h】

?uker Dragutin, Grgantov Zoran, Mili? Mirjana - INTRARATER AND INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF THE SPIKING EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT IN TOP MEN'S VOLLEYBALL

机译:?uker Dragutin,Grgantov Zoran,Mili? Mirjana-顶尖男子排球扣球效率评估的内部和内部可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

On a sample of 11 volleyball sets played in the Men's Champions League, intrarater and interrater reliability was analyzed in the rating of 503 spikes in attack and counterattack. Three reliability components (rater association, rater bias and rater distribution) were analyzed separately. The reliability of the first rater (the author of the study) was analyzed by employment of the test-retest method. In the process, correlation and differences of the same rater were analyzed at two points of time. This way, the rater's consistency in spike efficacy rating was tested. Repeated measurement was conducted on the same group of sets, four weeks after the first one, in order to avoid any influence of the first measurement exerted on the second measurement. An additional check of the first rater's reliability was conducted by comparison of his rating to the second (expert) rater's rating on the same sample of 11 randomly selected sets at the first point of time. Pearson's correlation coefficient was applied to determine the raters' maximum level of concordance at two points of time, as well as a very high level of concordance between the rater and the expert. The dependent samples t-test disclosed no differences between the raters at two points of time, while the independent samples t-test showed very small differences between the rater and the expert. The very high level of similarity in rating distribution between the raters in repeated measurements and the experts substantiates the very high level of reliability in the rating of events analyzed.
机译:在男子冠军联赛中打出的11排排球样本中,分析了内部评级者和间位球员的可靠性,得出进攻和反攻中503尖峰的等级。分别分析了三个可靠性组件(评估者关联,评估者偏差和评估者分布)。通过使用重测方法分析了第一评分者(该研究的作者)的可靠性。在此过程中,在两个时间点分析了同一评估者的相关性和差异。这样,就测试了评估者在峰值功效评估中的一致性。为了避免第一次测量对第二次测量产生任何影响,在第一组之后的四个星期对同一组重复进行测量。通过在第一时间点对11个随机选择的集合的相同样本进行比较,将第一评级者的评级与第二(专家)评级者的评级进行比较,以进行另一项检查。皮尔逊相关系数用于确定评估者在两个时间点的最大一致性,以及评估者与专家之间的非常高的一致性。相关样本t检验揭示了评估者在两个时间点之间没有差异,而独立样本t检验显示了评估者与专家之间的很小差异。重复测量中的评分者与专家之间的评分分布非常相似,这证明了所分析事件的评分具有很高的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号