首页> 外文期刊>Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz >Comparison between Two Methods for Diagnosis of Trichinellosis: Trichinoscopy and Artificial Digestion
【24h】

Comparison between Two Methods for Diagnosis of Trichinellosis: Trichinoscopy and Artificial Digestion

机译:旋毛虫病两种诊断方法的比较:旋毛虫镜检查和人工消化

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Two direct methods for the diagnosis of trichinellosis were compared: trichinoscopy and artificial digestion. Muscles from 17 wistar rats, orally infected with 500 Trichinella spiralis encysted larvae were examined. From each of the following muscles: diaphragm, tongue, masseters, intercostals, triceps brachialis and cuadriceps femoralis, 648,440 larvae from 1 g samples were recovered. The linear correlation between trichinoscopy and artificial digestion was very high and significant (r=0.94, p 0.0001), showing that both methods for the detection of muscular larvae did not differ significantly. In both methods, significant differences were found in the distribution of larvae per gramme of muscle
机译:比较了两种直接诊断旋毛虫病的方法:旋毛虫镜检查法和人工消化法。检查了来自17只wistar大鼠的肌肉,这些小鼠经口感染了500只旋毛虫旋毛虫幼虫。从以下肌肉中的每一个:tongue肌,舌头,咬肌,肋间肌,肱三头肌和股骨肱三头肌,从1 g样本中回收了648,440幼虫。三角镜检查与人工消化之间的线性相关性非常高且显着(r = 0.94,p <0.0001),表明两种检测肌肉幼虫的方法没有显着差异。在这两种方法中,发现每克肌肉中幼虫的分布存在显着差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号