首页> 外文期刊>Microbiologia Medica >Serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a complicated puzzle
【24h】

Serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a complicated puzzle

机译:血清学诊断肺炎支原体感染:一个复杂的难题

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Mycoplasma pneumoniae has a prominent role in respiratory tract infections, especially in children and young adults. Serological methods, in particular complement fixation test (CFT) and enzyme immunoassays (ELISA), are most widely used for the diagnosis. However, a reliable diagnosis remains difficult to achieve. Study Design. The population study was subdivided in 2 groups. Group 1) 52 serum samples from blood donors; group 2) 50 serum samples from 50 patients (23 women, 27 men) affected by atypical pneumonia. The mean age was 29.2 years (1 to 85 years) and 48% was under 20 years.The following commercial products were used: Chorus M. pneumoniae ELISA IgG and IgM, Chorus CFT total Ig (DIESSE, Siena, Italy). Results. Group 1) 67.3% of blood donors resulted positive for IgG and 19.2% positive or equivocal for IgM. Group 2) specific IgG were detected in 70% of the patients and IgM resulted positive or equivocal in 64%. Since the number of IgG positive subjects was similar in the 2 groups, the CFT test was added to better define acute stage of infection.The CFT test resulted positive in 92.3% of the IgG+IgM+, and in 41.7% of the IgG+IgM- serum samples, respectively. Conclusions. High titers of IgG do not necessarily identify acute or recent infection, as previously suggested. The CFT test showed a good correlation with ELISA test in IgG+IgM+ serum samples. Detection of IgM antibodies is still the most reliable test to define acute infection, especially if confirmed by a positive CFT test.
机译:背景。肺炎支原体在呼吸道感染中具有重要作用,尤其是在儿童和年轻人中。血清学方法,尤其是补体固定试验(CFT)和酶免疫测定(ELISA),被最广泛地用于诊断。然而,仍然难以实现可靠的诊断。学习规划。人口研究分为2组。第1组:52个来自献血者的血清样本;第2组:从50例非典型肺炎患者中(50名患者(23名女性,27名男性))采集了50份血清样本。平均年龄为29.2岁(1至85岁),其中48%在20岁以下。使用了以下商业产品:合唱性肺炎支原体ELISA IgG和IgM,合唱CFT总Ig(DIESSE,锡耶纳,意大利)。结果。第1组)67.3%的献血者IgG阳性,IgM阳性或不确定的为19.2%。第2组)在70%的患者中检测到了特异性IgG,在64%的患者中IgM呈阳性或模棱两可。由于两组中IgG阳性受试者的数量相似,因此添加了CFT测试以更好地确定急性感染阶段.CFT测试在92.3%的IgG + IgM +和41.7%的IgG + IgM中呈阳性-分别为血清样品。结论。如先前所建议,高滴度的IgG不一定能识别急性或近期感染。在IgG + IgM +血清样品中,CFT测试与ELISA测试显示出良好的相关性。 IgM抗体的检测仍然是确定急性感染的最可靠的检测方法,尤其是通过阳性CFT检测证实的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号