首页> 外文期刊>Methodological Innovations >Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples
【24h】

Comparing data quality between online panel and intercept samples

机译:在线面板和截取样本之间的数据质量比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Although some research effort has been devoted to the comparison of probability- and nonprobability-based Web surveys, different types of nonprobability-based samples have not been thoroughly examined. This exploratory study compares the data quality between online panel and intercept samples. Online panel refers to a pre-recruited and profiled pool of respondents. An intercept sample is a pool of respondents that are obtained through banners, ads, or promotions. Anyone can click on them and subsequently respond to a survey. Respondents are not pre-recruited or profiled. Three surveys with 52, 29, and 19 questions, respectively, were administered to both samples. Propensity score weighting adjustment is used for the analyses. The results show that the completion rates are higher for the panel than the intercept sample. The completion times are similar for these two samples. Data quality, on average, tends to be higher for panel than intercept samples.
机译:尽管已经进行了一些研究工作来比较基于概率和基于非概率的Web调查,但是尚未完全检查不同类型的基于非概率的样本。这项探索性研究比较了在线小组和截取样本之间的数据质量。在线小组指的是预先招聘和描述过的受访者群体。拦截样本是通过横幅,广告或促销获得的一组受访者。任何人都可以单击它们,然后响应调查。受访者未预先招聘或描述过。对两个样本分别进行了三个调查,分别有52、29和19个问题。倾向得分加权调整用于分析。结果表明,该小组的完成率高于拦截样品。这两个样本的完成时间相似。平均而言,面板的数据质量往往比截取样本更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号