首页> 外文期刊>Methodological Innovations >Making Ethical Decisions in an Online context: Reflections on using blogs to explore narratives of experience
【24h】

Making Ethical Decisions in an Online context: Reflections on using blogs to explore narratives of experience

机译:在网络环境中做出道德决策:使用博客探索经验叙事的思考

获取原文
       

摘要

Internet research methods can present some challenging ethical dilemmas. Although they are subject to the same guiding principles as 'offline' research, it can be difficult to apply these online given the blurring of boundaries presented by digitally-mediated environments. This paper considers a study that utilised personal blogs as primary data to outline two common ethical tensions in internet research: whether online communications can be considered public or private, and whether the people who produce them can be considered subjects or authors. The study examined the narratives of young people who took gap years overseas as represented in their travel blogs. While the blogs were technically public, they contained personal information, and individual perceptions or expectations of privacy can be different. The paper also explores how to establish if human subjects are involved in internet research, including the difficulties of protecting identity and the case for recognising authorship when appropriate. In line with contemporary scholarship on internet research ethics, this paper highlights the need for a contextual approach that recognises the specificities of the communications studied, the methods employed to generate and analyse data, and how the research is disseminated. The decisions made in the gap year study are critically evaluated, and alternative options presented, including a focus on ensuring that data are not linked to individuals without consent. The article aims to contribute to dialogue and debate in online research ethics through offering some reflections on the course of action taken.
机译:互联网研究方法可能会带来一些具有挑战性的道德困境。尽管它们遵循与“离线”研究相同的指导原则,但鉴于数字介导环境所呈现的边界模糊,可能很难在网上应用这些准则。本文考虑了一项研究,该研究利用个人博客作为主要数据来概述互联网研究中的两种常见的伦理张力:是否可以将在线交流视为公共还是私人,以及将其生成的人可以视为主题或作者。这项研究调查了旅行博客中所代表的在国外度过间隔时间的年轻人的叙事。尽管博客在技术上是公共的,但它们包含个人信息,并且个人对隐私的看法或期望可能有所不同。本文还探讨了如何确定人类受试者是否参与互联网研究,包括保护身份的困难和在适当时识别作者身份的案例。与当代有关互联网研究伦理的学术研究相一致,本文强调了一种上下文相关的方法的必要性,该方法应能够识别所研究的传播的特殊性,用于生成和分析数据的方法以及如何传播研究。间隙年研究中做出的决定将得到严格评估,并提出替代方案,包括着重确保未经同意就不会将数据链接到个人。本文旨在通过对所采取的行动进行一些反思,为在线研究伦理的对话和辩论做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号