首页> 外文期刊>Medicines >Bibliometric Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Production between 1982 and 2016 Indexed in PubMed
【24h】

Bibliometric Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Production between 1982 and 2016 Indexed in PubMed

机译:PubMed收录的1982年至2016年中医药科学生产的文献计量分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may be understood as a system of sensations and findings designed to establish the functional vegetative state of the body. This state may be treated by several therapeutic methods such as acupuncture, Chinese pharmacotherapy, dietetics, Tuina , and Qigong . Nowadays, as a result of several evidence-based reported beneficial effects over specific pathological conditions, there is an increasing tendency to integrate some of these practices in Western medicine. The main goal of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of TCM scientific production between 1982 and 2016 indexed in PubMed, by analyzing several parameters including time and location distribution, publication quality, experimental design, and treatment methods. Methods: The methodology was based on the quantitative inventory of published scientific research indexed in PubMed medical subject headings (MeSH), sorted within the broad term “Traditional Chinese Medicine” and integrating the following criteria as limit filters: “Species: Humans”, “Article Type: Clinical Trial”. In addition, the articles’ triage was ruled by temporal limitations set between 1945 and 2016. Results: The overall analysis of data allowed observation of an average annual growth of approximately 33%, with a productive peak of 122 articles in 2007. The scientific production was distributed in 27 countries, led by China (76.1%), followed by the United States of America (3.0%) and South Korea (2.1%). A significant amount of references were published in Chinese journals: more than 50%; however, these journals had a low impact factor. The most cited treatments in the keywords section of the articles were phytotherapy (55%) and acupuncture (40%). Conclusion: The increasing demand for TCM seems to be due to factors such as lower side effects and greater efficacy in some patients not responding well to conventional therapy. As a result, a considerable amount of TCM science-based literature has been produced, supporting the rational integration of these practices in Western healthcare systems and research. Our results show that the quality of TCM research and inherent publications have been increasing over the last decades, with a higher incidence of studies published in well-ranked journals.
机译:背景:中医(TCM)可以理解为一种旨在建立身体功能性植物状态的感觉和发现系统。这种状态可以通过几种治疗方法来治疗,例如针灸,中药治疗,饮食学,推拿和气功。如今,由于一些基于证据的报道对特定病理条件的有益作用,越来越多的趋势将其中一些实践纳入西医。这项研究的主要目的是通过分析包括时间和位置分布,出版质量,实验设计和治疗方法在内的几个参数,对1982年至2016年收录在PubMed中的中医药科学生产进行文献计量分析。方法:该方法基于在PubMed医学主题(MeSH)中索引的已发表科学研究的定量清单,并在“传统中药”的广义术语内进行分类,并整合以下标准作为极限过滤器:“物种:人类”,“文章类型:临床试验”。此外,文章的分类是由1945年至2016年之间的时间限制所决定的。结果:数据的整体分析使观察到的年平均增长率约为33%,在2007年达到了122篇文章的生产高峰。科学生产分布在27个国家/地区,以中国(76.1%)为首,其次是美国(3.0%)和韩国(2.1%)。中国期刊上发表了大量参考文献:超过50%;但是,这些期刊的影响因子很低。在文章的关键词部分,被引用最多的疗法是植物疗法(55%)和针灸(40%)。结论:对中药的需求增加似乎是由于某些副作用(例如对某些常规治疗反应不佳的患者)具有较低的副作用和更高的疗效所致。结果,产生了大量的中医科学文献,支持了这些实践在西方医疗体系和研究中的合理整合。我们的结果表明,在过去的几十年中,中医研究和内在出版物的质量一直在提高,在排名靠前的期刊上发表的研究也越来越多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号