首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicines >Bibliometric Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Production between 1982 and 2016 Indexed in PubMed
【2h】

Bibliometric Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Production between 1982 and 2016 Indexed in PubMed

机译:PubMed收录的1982年至2016年中医药科学生产的文献计量分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may be understood as a system of sensations and findings designed to establish the functional vegetative state of the body. This state may be treated by several therapeutic methods such as acupuncture, Chinese pharmacotherapy, dietetics, Tuina, and Qigong. Nowadays, as a result of several evidence-based reported beneficial effects over specific pathological conditions, there is an increasing tendency to integrate some of these practices in Western medicine. The main goal of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of TCM scientific production between 1982 and 2016 indexed in PubMed, by analyzing several parameters including time and location distribution, publication quality, experimental design, and treatment methods. >Methods: The methodology was based on the quantitative inventory of published scientific research indexed in PubMed medical subject headings (MeSH), sorted within the broad term “Traditional Chinese Medicine” and integrating the following criteria as limit filters: “Species: Humans”, “Article Type: Clinical Trial”. In addition, the articles’ triage was ruled by temporal limitations set between 1945 and 2016. >Results: The overall analysis of data allowed observation of an average annual growth of approximately 33%, with a productive peak of 122 articles in 2007. The scientific production was distributed in 27 countries, led by China (76.1%), followed by the United States of America (3.0%) and South Korea (2.1%). A significant amount of references were published in Chinese journals: more than 50%; however, these journals had a low impact factor. The most cited treatments in the keywords section of the articles were phytotherapy (55%) and acupuncture (40%). >Conclusion: The increasing demand for TCM seems to be due to factors such as lower side effects and greater efficacy in some patients not responding well to conventional therapy. As a result, a considerable amount of TCM science-based literature has been produced, supporting the rational integration of these practices in Western healthcare systems and research. Our results show that the quality of TCM research and inherent publications have been increasing over the last decades, with a higher incidence of studies published in well-ranked journals.
机译:>背景:中医(TCM)可以理解为一种旨在建立人体功能性植物状态的感觉和发现系统。这种状态可以通过几种治疗方法来治疗,例如针灸,中药治疗,饮食学,推拿和气功。如今,由于一些基于证据的报道对特定病理条件的有益作用,越来越有将这些实践中的一些整合到西医中的趋势。这项研究的主要目的是通过分析包括时间和位置分布,出版质量,实验设计和治疗方法在内的几个参数,对在PubMed中检索到的1982年至2016年中医药科学生产进行文献计量分析。 >方法:该方法是基于已发表的以PubMed医学主题(MeSH)为主题的科学研究的定量清单,并在“传统中医”的广义术语内进行分类,并结合以下标准作为极限过滤器: “物种:人类”,“文章类型:临床试验”。此外,文章的分流受1945年至2016年之间的时间限制所限制。>结果:数据的整体分析使得观察到的年平均增长率约为33%,生产峰值为122 2007年的科学论文分布在27个国家/地区,中国居首(76.1%),其次是美国(3.0%)和韩国(2.1%)。中国期刊上发表了大量参考文献:超过50%;但是,这些期刊的影响因子很低。在文章的关键词部分,被引用最多的疗法是植物疗法(55%)和针灸(40%)。 >结论:对中药的需求增加似乎是由于某些副作用(例如对某些对常规疗法反应不佳的患者的副作用较低和疗效更高)引起的。结果,已经产生了大量基于中医科学的文献,支持了这些实践在西方医疗体系和研究中的合理整合。我们的结果表明,在过去的几十年中,中医研究和内在出版物的质量一直在提高,在排名靠前的期刊上发表的研究也越来越多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号