...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Intraoperative Radiotherapy Versus Whole-Breast External Beam Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Intraoperative Radiotherapy Versus Whole-Breast External Beam Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:早期乳腺癌术中放疗与全乳外束放疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There has not been a clear answer about the efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for women with early-stage breast cancer. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of IORT with those of whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for women with early-stage breast cancer. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to October 2014. Two authors independently conducted the literature selection and data extraction. Studies that compared IORT with whole-breast EBRT were included in the systematic review. IORT was defined as a single dose of irradiation to the tumor bed during breast-conserving surgery rather than whole-breast irradiation. Qualities of RCTs were evaluated according to the PEDro scale. Qualities of non-RCTs were evaluated according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). The risk ratios (RRs) of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, overall mortality, breast cancer mortality, non-breast cancer mortality, and distant metastasis were pooled using a random-effects model. Four studies with 5415 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 non-RCTs. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was significantly higher in patients with IORT compared to those with whole-breast EBRT (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.23–6.51), but with significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 58.5%, P = 0.065). Comparing IORT with whole-breast EBRT, the pooled RRs for overall mortality, breast cancer mortality, non-breast cancer mortality, and distant metastasis were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66–1.17), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.77–1.86), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.44–1.31), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.61–1.49), respectively. IORT had a significantly higher risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence than whole-breast EBRT. Overall mortality did not differ significantly. IORT should be used in conjunction with the prudent selection of suitable patients. It is imperative to identify women with a low risk of local recurrence.
机译:关于术中放疗(IORT)对早期乳腺癌女性的疗效尚无明确答案。这项荟萃分析的目的是总结可比较的证据,将IORT与全乳外束放射疗法(EBRT)对早期乳腺癌的疗效和安全性进行比较。截至2014年10月,对MEDLINE,EMBASE,Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行了搜索。两名作者独立进行了文献选择和数据提取。系统评价包括将IORT与全乳EBRT进行比较的研究。 IORT被定义为在保乳手术期间对肿瘤床的单剂量照射,而不是全乳照射。根据PEDro量表评估RCT的质量。根据非随机化研究方法学指数(MINORS)评估了非RCT的质量。使用随机效应模型汇总同侧乳腺癌复发,总死亡率,乳腺癌死亡率,非乳腺癌死亡率和远处转移的风险比(RRs)。这项荟萃分析包括四项针对5415例患者的研究,包括2项随机对照试验(RCT)和2项非RCT。 IORT患者的同侧乳腺肿瘤复发率明显高于全乳EBRT患者(RR 2.83,95%CI 1.23–6.51),但异质性显着(I 2 = 58.5%,P = 0.065)。将IORT与全乳EBRT进行比较,总死亡率,乳腺癌死亡率,非乳腺癌死亡率和远处转移的合并RR为0.88(95%CI:0.66-1.17),1.20(95%CI:0.77-1.86)。 ,0.76(95%CI:0.44-1.31)和0.95(95%CI:0.61-1.49)。 IORT患同侧乳腺肿瘤复发的风险明显高于全乳EBRT。总死亡率无明显差异。 IORT应配合使用合适的患者的审慎选择。必须确定局部复发风险低的妇女。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号