首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The modified balloon crush technique: A simplified approach to optimizing final kissing balloon inflation
【24h】

The modified balloon crush technique: A simplified approach to optimizing final kissing balloon inflation

机译:改进的气球挤压技术:一种用于优化最终接吻气球充气的简化方法

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of the modified balloon crush technique . The conventional crush technique accompanies difficult and suboptimal final kissing balloon inflation (FKI) In a single-center percutaneous coronary intervention registry, 515 patients with 515 bifurcation lesions were treated with the modified balloon technique (n = 70) or the conventional crush technique (n = 445). In contrast to the conventional crush technique , where the implanted side branch (SB) stent is crushed by expansion of the main branch (MB) stent, the modified balloon crush technique uses balloon crushing and additional SB ballooning across the crushed SB stent before MB stenting to facilitate FKI. The primary outcome of interest was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between the 2 treatment groups. FKI had comparable success rates in both groups (97.1% for the modified balloon group and 98.4% for the conventional crush group; P = .35). There were no differences in procedure time, fluoroscopic time, or contrast amount between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow up, the cumulative MACE incidences were comparable between the 2 groups (7.3% vs 8.8%; P = .73). The incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was significantly lower after the modified balloon crush technique compared with the conventional crush technique (0% vs 5.6%; P = .048). The modified balloon crush technique appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to the conventional crush technique with the potential to reduce the revascularization rate.
机译:本研究旨在探讨改良球囊压迫技术的可行性和安全性。常规挤压技术伴有困难且次优的最终接吻球囊扩张(FKI)。在单中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册中心,采用改良球囊技术(n = 70)或常规挤压技术(n = 445)。与传统的挤压技术不同,在传统的挤压技术中,植入的侧支(SB)支架通过主分支(MB)支架的扩张而被挤压,改良的球囊挤压技术使用球囊挤压和在MB支架之前在被击碎的SB支架上进行额外的SB气球膨胀方便FKI。感兴趣的主要结果是主要的不良心血管事件(MACE),由全因死亡,自发性心肌梗塞和靶血管血运重建综合而成。 2个治疗组之间的基线临床和血管造影特征相似。 FKI在两组中的成功率均相当(改良气囊组为97.1%,常规挤压组为98.4%; P = 0.35)。两组之间的手术时间,透视时间或对比量没有差异。在1年的随访中,两组的MACE累积发生率相当(7.3%对8.8%; P = 0.73)。与常规挤压技术相比,改良球囊挤压技术后目标病变血运重建术(TLR)的发生率显着降低(0%比5.6%; P = .048)。改进的球囊挤压技术似乎是常规挤压技术的可行和安全的替代方法,具有降低血运重建率的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号