...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Efficacy and Adverse Events of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Cyclophosphamide for Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and Adverse Events of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Cyclophosphamide for Induction Therapy of Lupus Nephritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:麦考酚酸酯与环磷酰胺对狼疮性肾炎的诱导治疗疗效和不良事件:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare complete remission and adverse events (that is, infection, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal [GI] symptoms) between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). We identified trials from MEDLINE using the PubMed and Ovid search engines, and from The Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing MMF with CYC with 1 of following outcomes: complete remission, complete/partial remission, infection, leukopenia, GI symptoms, serum creatinine, 24-hour urine protein, and urine albumin. Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. Five trials with a total of 638 patients were eligible for review. While the MMF group tended to achieve complete remission more frequently than the CYC group, this was not significant (pooled risk ratio [RR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-2.93). Pooling based on the 4 homogeneous trials yielded similar results-that is, no benefit of MMF compared with CYC groups (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.74-1.77). The complete or partial remission rates were also not different (pooled RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.97-1.48) among the groups. The adverse events (infection, renal function, and GI symptoms) were not significantly different, except for leukopenia, which was lower in the MMF group. In summary, patients treated with MMF and CYC had similar remission rates, but the MMF group had less frequent leukopenia than the CYC group. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these results. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, CYC = cyclophosphamide, df = degree of freedom, GI = gastrointestinal, LN = lupus nephritis, MMF = mycophenolate mofetil, NNH = number needed to harm, NNT = number needed to treat, PRISMA = preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, RR = risk ratio, SE = standard error, SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus, SMD = standardized mean difference, WHO = World Health Organization.
机译:我们进行了随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较霉酚酸酯(MMF)和环磷酰胺(CYC)之间的完全缓解和不良事件(即感染,白细胞减少和胃肠道[GI]症状)进行比较,狼疮性肾炎(LN)。我们使用PubMed和Ovid搜索引擎从MEDLINE以及随机对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册中确定了试验。符合条件的研究为随机对照试验,将MMF与CYC进行比较,结果如下:完全缓解,完全/部分缓解,感染,白细胞减少症,胃肠道症状,血清肌酐,24小时尿蛋白和尿白蛋白。数据由2位审阅者独立提取。共有638例患者的五项试验符合评估条件。尽管MMF组比CYC组更容易获得完全缓解,但这并不显着(合并风险比[RR]为1.60; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.87-2.93)。基于4个同类试验的合并得出的结果相似-也就是说,与CYC组相比,MMF没有任何益处(RR,1.15; 95%CI,0.74-1.77)。各组之间的全部或部分缓解率也没有差异(合并RR,1.21; 95%CI,0.97-1.48)。除白细胞减少症(MMF组中的白细胞减少症)外,其他不良事件(感染,肾功能和胃肠道症状)无显着差异。总之,接受MMF和CYC治疗的患者的缓解率相近,但MMF组的白细胞减少症发病率低于CYC组。需要进一步的大规模试验以确认这些结果。缩写:CI =置信区间,CYC =环磷酰胺,df =自由度,GI =胃肠道,LN =狼疮性肾炎,MMF =霉酚酸酯,NNH =需要伤害的数量,NNT =需要治疗的数量,PRISMA =优选的报告项目对于系统评价和荟萃分析,RR =风险比率,SE =标准误,SLE =系统性红斑狼疮,SMD =标准化均数差,WHO =世界卫生组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号