...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Efficacy and safety of once daily versus twice daily mesalazine for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of once daily versus twice daily mesalazine for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:每日一次与每日两次美沙拉嗪对轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety between once daily (OD) and twice daily (BD) regime dosing of mesalazine for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science from 1990 to November 2018 were investigated. We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OD with BD regime dosing of mesalazine for mild-to-moderate UC. The software Review Manager 5.3 was used to pool the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Eight RCTs containing 3495 patients were identified. Regardless of induction of remission or maintenance of remission of UC, OD regime dosing of mesalazine was as effective as BD regime dosing in clinical and endoscopic remission and clinical remission. Also, no obvious difference was found between OD and BD regime dosing of mesalazine regardless of total adverse events, treatment-related adverse events or serious adverse events. Conclusion: OD is as effective and safe as BD regime dosing of mesalazine for active UC.
机译:背景:我们旨在进行荟萃分析,以评估美沙拉嗪治疗轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的每日一次(OD)和每天两次(BD)方案之间的疗效和安全性。方法:对1990年至2018年11月的PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science进行了调查。我们搜索了将美沙拉嗪的OD与BD方案剂量用于轻度至中度UC的随机对照试验(RCT)。软件Review Manager 5.3用于以95%置信区间(CI)汇总风险比(RR)。结果:确定了8个RCT,共3495名患者。不论诱导UC缓解或维持UC缓解,美沙拉嗪的OD方案剂量在临床和内镜缓解以及临床缓解方面与BD方案剂量一样有效。而且,无论总不良事件,治疗相关不良事件还是严重不良事件,美沙拉嗪的OD和BD方案剂量之间均未发现明显差异。结论:对于活动性UC,OD与美沙拉嗪的BD方案剂量一样安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号