...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic versus open approach for treating symptomatic urachal remnants in adults
【24h】

Umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic versus open approach for treating symptomatic urachal remnants in adults

机译:保脐腹腔镜与开放式方法治疗成人有症状的尿道残留

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The traditional surgical approach for removing a symptomatic urachal remnant is via a lower midline laparotomy and infraumbilical incision or a laparoscopic approach with umbilicoplasty. We reviewed our experience with umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic urachal remnant excision in a single-center study and evaluated its efficacy versus open approach (OA). This study was a retrospective study. Between March 2012 and September 2016, 32 consecutive patients with symptomatic urachal remnants underwent the umbilicus-sparing laparoscopic approach (USLA) (n = 17) or OA (n = 15). The efficacy, recovery, and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Our Results showed that the clinical characteristics of the patients in each group, such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and disease type, had no significant differences ( P > .05). No significant difference was found in the surgical procedure times (76.1 ± 15.4 vs 69.2 ± 13.9 minutes, P = .189) and intraoperative blood loss (29.4 ± 13.3 vs 32.2 ± 12.9 mL, P = .543) between the USLA groups and OA groups. However, the mean postoperative hospital stay (patients with bladder cuff excision: 4.1 ± 1.8 vs 6.1 ± 1.4 days, P = .040 and patients without bladder cuff excision: 1.8 ± 0.5 vs 3.6 ± 0.8 days, P < .001) and the time of full recovery (11.2 ± 1.9 vs 15.6 ± 3.1 days, P < .001), the USLA group were both significantly shorter than that of the OA group. No infected recurrence and malignant transformation had occurred at a mean follow-up of 32.4 ± 8.1 and 34.1 ± 8.8 months in USLA group and OA group, respectively. In conclusion, to minimize the morbidity of radical excision, umbilicus-sparing management of benign urachal remnants in adults is a safe and efficacious alternative with superior cosmetic outcomes, postoperative recovery compared with an OA or umbilicoplasty.
机译:去除有症状的尿道残余物的传统手术方法是通过下中线剖腹术和脐下切口或腹腔镜加脐带成形术。我们在一项单中心研究中回顾了保留脐带腹腔镜下尿道残留手术的经验,并评估了其与开放式手术(OA)的疗效。这项研究是一项回顾性研究。在2012年3月至2016年9月之间,连续32例有症状的尿道残留的患者接受了保留脐腹腔镜(USLA)(n = 17)或OA(n = 15)。疗效,恢复和长期结果进行了审查。我们的结果表明,每组患者的临床特征,例如年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI)和疾病类型,均无显着差异(P> .05)。 USLA组和OA之间的手术时间(76.1±15.4 vs 69.2±13.9分钟,P = .189)和术中失血(29.4±13.3 vs 32.2±12.9 mL,P = .543)没有显着差异组。但是,术后平均住院时间(有膀胱袖套切除术的患者:4.1±1.8 vs 6.1±1.4天,P = .040和没有膀胱袖套切除术的患者:1.8±0.5 vs 3.6±0.8天,P <.001),并且完全恢复时间(11.2±1.9比15.6±3.1天,P <.001),USLA组均显着低于OA组。 USLA组和OA组的平均随访时间分别为32.4±8.1和34.1±8.8个月,未发生感染复发和恶变。总之,为了最大程度地减少根治性切除术的发病率,保管成人良性尿道残留的脐带血是一种安全有效的替代方法,具有出色的美容效果,与OA或脐带成形术相比,术后恢复良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号