...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >How Well Do Patients Understand Written Instructions?: Health Literacy Assessment in Rural and Urban Rheumatology Outpatients
【24h】

How Well Do Patients Understand Written Instructions?: Health Literacy Assessment in Rural and Urban Rheumatology Outpatients

机译:患者对书面说明的理解程度如何?:城乡风湿病门诊病人的健康素养评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess health literacy (word recognition and comprehension) in patients at a rural rheumatology practice and to compare this to health literacy levels in patients from an urban rheumatology practice. Inclusion criteria for this cross-sectional study were as follows: ≥18-year-old patients at a rural rheumatology practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic, Coffs Harbour, Australia) and an urban Sydney rheumatology practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice, Kogarah, Australia). Exclusion criteria were as follows: ill-health precluding participation; poor vision/hearing, non-English primary language. Word recognition was assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). Comprehension was assessed using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA). Practical comprehension and numeracy were assessed by asking patients to follow prescribing instructions for 5 common rheumatology medications. At the rural practice (Mid-North Coast Arthritis Clinic), 124/160 patients agreed to participate (F:M 83:41, mean age 60.3?±?12.2) whereas the corresponding number at the urban practice (Combined Rheumatology Practice) was 99/119 (F:M 69:30, mean age 60.7?±?17.5). Urban patients were more likely to be born overseas, speak another language at home, and be employed. There was no difference in REALM or TOFHLA scores between the 2 sites, and so data were pooled. REALM scores indicated 15% (33/223) of patients had a reading level ≤Grade 8 whereas 8% (18/223) had marginal or inadequate functional health literacy as assessed by the TOFHLA. Dosing instructions for ibuprofen and methotrexate were incorrectly understood by 32% (72/223) and 21% (46/223) of patients, respectively. Up to 15% of rural and urban patients had low health literacy and There was no significant difference in word recognition, functional health literacy, and numeracy between rural and urban rheumatology patients.
机译:摘要:这项研究的目的是评估农村风湿病实践中患者的健康素养(单词识别和理解),并将其与城市风湿病实践中患者的健康素养水平进行比较。此横断面研究的纳入标准如下:≥18岁的患者在农村风湿病科室(澳大利亚北科特迪瓦中部海岸关节炎诊所)和城市悉尼的风湿病科室(澳大利亚科加拉联合风湿病科,澳大利亚)。排除标准如下:健康不良,无法参与;视力/听力较差,非英语为主语言。使用医学成人素养快速评估(REALM)评估单词识别能力。使用成人功能健康素养测试(TOFHLA)评估了理解能力。通过要求患者遵循5种常见风湿病药物的处方说明来评估实际的理解和计算能力。在农村诊所(中北海岸关节炎诊所),同意参加的患者为124/160(F:M 83:41,平均年龄60.3±12.2岁),而在城市诊所(风湿病联合治疗)的相应人数为99/119(F:M 69:30,平均年龄60.7±17.5岁)。城市患者更有可能在国外出生,在家说另一种语言并被雇用。两个站点之间的REALM或TOFHLA分数没有差异,因此将数据汇总。 REALM评分表明,根据TOFHLA的评估,有15%(33/223)的患者阅读水平≤8级,而8%(18/223)的患者的功能健康素养水平较低或不足。分别有32%(72/223)和21%(46/223)的患者误解了布洛芬和甲氨蝶呤的给药说明。多达15%的城乡风湿病患者的健康素养较低,城乡风湿病患者在单词识别,功能健康素养和计算能力方面无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号