首页> 外文期刊>Medical principles and practice: international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre >Comparisons of the Tono-Pen? and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in a Hospital Population in Southwest Nigeria
【24h】

Comparisons of the Tono-Pen? and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in a Hospital Population in Southwest Nigeria

机译:Tono-Pen的比较?和Goldmann压平眼压计在尼日利亚西南部医院人群中测量原发性开角型青光眼患者的眼压

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Tono-Pen? to that measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma attending a glaucoma clinic. Subjects and Methods: A comparative clinic-based observational study was conducted involving 75 patients (39 men and 36 women) attending a glaucoma clinic in Southwest Nigeria. A pretested structured questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic data. The Tono-Pen and the GAT were used to measure the IOP in each patient. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter, and the corrected GAT value was calculated for each patient. The Tono-Pen readings were compared with the uncorrected and corrected GAT readings. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. Values for p Results: The mean age of the participants was 60.39 ± 16.71 years. The mean IOP using the Tono-Pen was 21.1 ± 6.8 mm Hg versus the mean uncorrected GAT value of 17.1 ± 6.9 mm Hg and the corrected GAT value of 18.9 ± 7.5 mm Hg. The mean CCT was 510.5 ± 29.6 μm. The mean differences between the Tono-Pen reading and uncorrected and corrected GAT readings were 3.9 ± 2.6 and 2.1 ± 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. Gender (Tono-Pen vs. GAT; p = 0.981 vs. 0.437) and corneal thickness (p = 0.057) did not significantly affect the IOP value. Of the 75 patients, 68 (90.7%) preferred the Tono-Pen to the GAT. Conclusion: In this study, the Tono-Pen gave a higher value for IOP than the uncorrected and corrected GAT values. Gender and corneal thickness did not significantly affect the measurements. Most patients found the Tono-Pen more acceptable than the GAT.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是将眼压(IOP)与Tono-Pen?进行比较。与使用戈德曼压平眼压计(GAT)对在青光眼诊所就诊的原发性开角型青光眼患者的测量结果进行比较。受试者与方法:在尼日利亚西南部进行了一项基于临床比较研究的观察性研究,涉及75名患者(39例男性和36例女性)。预先测试的结构化问卷用于收集社会人口统计学数据。使用Tono-Pen和GAT来测量每位患者的IOP。用超声测厚仪测量角膜中央厚度(CCT),并为每位患者计算校正的GAT值。将Tono-Pen读数与未校正和校正的GAT读数进行比较。进行描述性和比较性分析。 p结果的值:参与者的平均年龄为60.39±16.71岁。使用Tono-Pen的平均IOP为21.1±6.8 mm Hg,而未校正的GAT平均值为17.1±6.9 mm Hg,校正的GAT值为18.9±7.5 mm Hg。平均CCT为510.5±29.6μm。 Tono-Pen读数与未校正和校正的GAT读数之间的平均差异分别为3.9±2.6和2.1±3.5 mm Hg。性别(Tono-Pen对GAT; p = 0.981对0.437)和角膜厚度(p = 0.057)对IOP值没有显着影响。在75名患者中,有68名(90.7%)倾向于使用Tono-Pen而不是GAT。结论:在这项研究中,Tono-Pen的IOP值比未校正和校正的GAT值高。性别和角膜厚度没有显着影响测量。大多数患者发现Tono-Pen比GAT更可接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号