首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Editorial: Language Development in the Digital Age
【24h】

Editorial: Language Development in the Digital Age

机译:社论:数字时代的语言发展

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction The digital age is changing our children's lives and childhood dramatically. New technologies transform the way people interact with each other, the way stories are shared and distributed, and the way reality is presented and perceived. Parents experience that toddlers can handle tablets and apps with a level of sophistication the children's grandparents can only envy. In Great Britain, a recent survey of preschoolers shows that a rising number of toddlers are now put to bed with a tablet instead of a bedtime story. In the USA, a telephone survey of 1,009 parents of children aged 2–24 months (Zimmerman et al., 2007a ) documents that by 3 months of age, about 40% of children regularly watched television, DVDs or videos, while by 24 months the proportion rose to 90%. Moreover, with the advance and exponential use of social media, children see their parents constantly interacting with mobile devices, instead of with people around them. Still, research in the US indicates that assistive social robots seem to have a favorable effect on children's language development ( Westlund et al. ).Existing theories of language acquisition emphasize the role of language input and the child's interaction with the environment as crucial to language development. From this perspective, we need to ask: What are the consequences of this new digital reality for children's acquisition of the most fundamental of all human skills: language and communication? Are new theories needed that can help us understand how children acquire language? Do the new digital environment and the new ways of interaction change the way languages are learned, or the quality of language acquisition? Is the use of new media beneficial or harmful to children's language and cognitive development? Can new technologies be tailored to support child growth and, most importantly, can they be designed to enhance language learning in vulnerable children?These questions and issues can only be addressed by means of an interdisciplinary approach that aims at developing new methods of data collection and analysis in a longitudinal perspective. This type of research is however not yet documented. Past and current research The question of how the ecology of the child affects the acquisition of competencies and skills has been approached from different perspectives in different disciplines. In linguistics, the central question addressed concerns the specific role of exposure to language. Two influential types of theory have been proposed. One view is that the capacity to learn language is hard-wired in the human brain (Chomsky, 1965 ; Pinker, 1994 ); linguistic input is merely a trigger for language to develop. From an alternative view, language acquisition depends on the linguistic environment of the child, and specifically on language input provided through child-adult communication and interaction (Tomasello, 2003 ). The latter view further specifies that factors in interaction are crucial for language learning to take place. Such views are aligned with overarching theories of human development in cognitive science and psychology. These theories (known as embodied and situated cognition theories) hold that knowledge is acquired by humans through rich physical and social interaction with their environment (Barsalou, 2008 ). This interaction leaves multiple traces provided by a number of modalities (auditory, visual, haptic etc.) and helps consolidate knowledge in the brain by strengthening the neural networks that support learning and the use of knowledge. Exactly how input received from multiple, and multi-sensory in nature sources, interacts in both knowledge acquisition and use is, however, still poorly understood.A current theme in the fields of information technology, artificial intelligence and robotics is to create robots that develop, as children do, and to establish how embodiment and interaction support language learning in these machines. These artificial models will eventually inform us about child development and vice versa (Cangelosi and Schlesinger, 2015 , forthcoming ). In the field of human-machine interaction, research is investigating whether using a physical robot, rather than a virtual agent or a computer-based video, has a positive effect on language development. Kennedy et al. ( 2015 ), for example, investigate how toy-like robots, such as, the Aldebaran Nao, are used in the classroom instead of, or together with, digital tools such as tablets, to show how a richer embodied technology method further improves language learning. Vogt envisage that, in the digital age, social robots will increasingly be used for educational purposes, such as, second language tutoring. They propose a number of design features to develop a child-friendly social robot that can effectively support children in second language learning, and discuss the technical challenges for developing such tutors.In education research, the main question is the extent to wh
机译:简介数字时代正在极大地改变我们孩子的生活和童年。新技术改变了人们彼此互动的方式,故事的共享和分发方式以及呈现和感知现实的方式。父母体验到,幼儿可以以孩子祖父母只能羡慕的程度来处理平板电脑和应用程序。在英国,最近对学龄前儿童的一项调查显示,现在越来越多的幼儿被平板电脑上床睡觉,而不是睡前的故事。在美国,一项针对1,009名2至24个月大的儿童的父母的电话调查(Zimmerman等,2007a)显示,到3个月大时,大约40%的儿童经常看电视,DVD或视频,而到24个月时比例上升到90%。此外,随着社交媒体的迅猛发展,孩子们看到父母不断与移动设备互动,而不是与周围的人互动。尽管如此,美国的研究表明,辅助社交机器人似乎对儿童的语言发展具有良好的影响(Westlund等人)。现有的语言习得理论强调语言输入的作用以及儿童与环境的互动对于语言至关重要。发展。从这个角度来看,我们需要问:这种新的数字现实对儿童获得所有人类最基本技能(语言和交流)的后果是什么?是否需要新的理论来帮助我们理解儿童如何获得语言?新的数字环境和新的交互方式是否会改变语言的学习方式或语言习得的质量?使用新媒体是否对儿童的语言和认知发展有利还是有害?是否可以量身定制新技术以支持儿童成长,最重要的是,可以设计新技术来增强弱势儿童的语言学习。这些问题只能通过跨学科的方法来解决,该方法旨在开发新的数据收集和处理方法。纵向分析。但是,这种类型的研究尚未记录。过去和当前的研究在不同学科中,从不同的角度探讨了儿童的生态如何影响能力和技能获得的问题。在语言学中,所解决的中心问题涉及暴露于语言的特定作用。已经提出了两种有影响力的理论类型。一种观点认为,学习语言的能力与人脑息息相关(Chomsky,1965; Pinker,1994)。语言输入仅仅是语言发展的触发因素。从另一种观点来看,语言习得取决于儿童的语言环境,尤其取决于通过儿童与成人的交流和互动提供的语言输入(Tomasello,2003)。后一种观点进一步指出,相互作用的因素对于进行语言学习至关重要。这种观点与认知科学和心理学中人类发展的总体理论相一致。这些理论(被称为具体化和情境认知理论)认为,知识是人类通过与环境之间丰富的身体和社会互动而获得的(Barsalou,2008年)。这种交互作用留下了多种方式(听觉,视觉,触觉等)提供的多种痕迹,并通过加强支持学习和使用知识的神经网络来帮助巩固大脑中的知识。从自然界中的多种多样的,多感官的接收中获得的输入究竟如何在知识获取和使用中相互作用仍然鲜为人知。信息技术,人工智能和机器人技术领域的当前主题是创造能够,就像孩子一样,并建立体现力和互动方式如何在这些机器中支持语言学习。这些人工模型最终将告诉我们有关儿童发育的信息,反之亦然(Cangelosi和Schlesinger,2015年,即将出版)。在人机交互领域,研究正在调查使用物理机器人(而不是虚拟代理或基于计算机的视频)是否对语言发展产生积极影响。肯尼迪等。 (2015)研究了如何在教室中使用像Aldebaran Nao这样的玩具式机器人来代替数字化工具(如平板电脑)或与之一起使用,以展示更丰富的体现技术方法如何进一步改善语言学习。 Vogt设想,在数字时代,社交机器人将越来越多地用于教育目的,例如第二语言辅导。他们提出了许多设计特征来开发一种对儿童友好的社交机器人,该机器人可以有效地支持儿童进行第二语言学习,并讨论了发展此类导师的技术挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号