首页> 外文期刊>Medical Devices: Evidence and Research >Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
【24h】

Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study

机译:微创sa关节融合术的安全性和6个月有效性:一项前瞻性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is an often overlooked cause of low back pain. SI joint arthrodesis has been reported to relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients suffering from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint who have failed non-surgical care. We report herein early results of a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort of patients with SI joint degeneration or disruption who underwent minimally invasive fusion using the iFuse Implant System?.Methods: The safety cohort includes 94 subjects at 23 sites with chronic SI joint pain who met study eligibility criteria and underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System? between August 2012 and September 2013. Subjects underwent structured assessments preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, including SI joint and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D). Patient satisfaction with surgery was assessed at 6 months. The effectiveness cohort includes the 32 subjects who have had 6-month follow-up to date.Results: Mean subject age was 51 years (n=94, safety cohort) and 66% of patients were women. Subjects were highly debilitated at baseline (mean VAS pain score 78, mean ODI score 54). Three implants were used in 80% of patients; two patients underwent staged bilateral implants. Twenty-three adverse events occurred within 1 month of surgery and 29 additional events occurred between 30 days and latest follow-up. Six adverse events were severe but none were device-related. Complete 6-month postoperative follow-up was available in 26 subjects. In the effectiveness cohort, mean (± standard deviation) SI joint pain improved from a baseline score of 76 (±16.2) to a 6-month score of 29.3 (±23.3, an improvement of 49 points, P<0.0001), mean ODI improved from 55.3 (±10.7) to 38.9 (±18.5, an improvement of 15.8 points, P<0.0001) and SF-36 PCS improved from 30.7 (±4.3) to 37.0 (±10.7, an improvement of 6.7 points, P=0.003). Ninety percent of subjects who were ambulatory at baseline regained full ambulation by month 6; median time to full ambulation was 30 days. Satisfaction with the procedure was high at 85%.Conclusion: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System? is safe. Mid-term follow-up indicates a high rate of improvement in pain and function with high rates of patient satisfaction.
机译:背景:Sa(SI)关节痛是经常被忽视的下腰痛原因。据报道,SI关节置换术可减轻因非手术治疗失败而遭受SI关节变性或破坏的患者的疼痛并改善其生活质量。我们在此报告了使用iFuse植入系统进行微创融合的SI关节变性或破坏患者的多中心前瞻性单臂队列研究的早期结果。方法:安全队列包括94名受试者,涉及23个慢性SI关节疼痛的患者是否符合研究资格标准,并通过iFuse植入系统进行了微创SI关节融合?在2012年8月至2013年9月之间。对受试者进行术前,术后即刻以及术后1、3和6个月的结构化评估,包括SI关节和背痛视觉模拟量表(VAS),Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),简表- 36(SF-36)和EuroQoL-5D(EQ-5D)。在6个月时评估患者对手术的满意度。有效性队列包括迄今进行了6个月随访的32名受试者。结果:受试者平均年龄为51岁(n = 94,安全性队列),其中66%的患者为女性。受试者在基线时非常虚弱(平均VAS疼痛评分78,平均ODI评分54)。 80%的患者使用了三种植入物;两名患者分阶段进行了双侧植入。在手术的1个月内发生了23例不良事件,在30天到最近的随访之间发生了29例其他事件。六个不良事件很严重,但与设备无关。共有26名受试者完成了为期6个月的术后随访。在有效性队列中,SI关节平均疼痛(±标准差)从基线评分76(±16.2)改善到6个月评分29.3(±23.3,改善49点,P <0.0001),平均ODI从55.3(±10.7)改善到38.9(±18.5,改善15.8点,P <0.0001),SF-36 PCS从30.7(±4.3)改善到37.0(±10.7,6.7点改善,P = 0.003 )。基线时可走动的受试者中有90%在第6个月之前恢复了完全的下床活动;完全步行的中位时间为30天。对手术的满意率高达85%。结论:使用iFuse植入系统进行微创SI关节融合?是安全的。中期随访表明,疼痛和功能的改善率很高,患者满意度很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号