...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Why Broca's Area Damage Does Not Result in Classical Broca's Aphasia
【24h】

Why Broca's Area Damage Does Not Result in Classical Broca's Aphasia

机译:为什么Broca的区域损伤不会导致经典的Broca失语症

获取原文
           

摘要

Traditionally it has been assumed that language production is controlled by Broca's area, corresponding to Brodmann's area (BA) 44 ( pars opercularis of the left hemisphere) (e.g., Head, 1926 ; Luria, 1947/1970 ; Goldstein, 1948 ; Hécaen, 1972 ; Damasio and Geschwind, 1984 ). Since about some 20 years ago, it has been considered that BA45 ( pars triangularis ) is also part of the Broca's area (Foundas et al., 1996 ). Some authors have referred to a more extended language production system; Hagoort ( 2005 , 2006 ) proposed that there is a “Broca's complex,” including BA44, BA45, and also BA47. Lemaire et al. ( 2013 ) refer to an extended Broca's area; Kadis et al. ( 2016 ) to an expressive language network; Bernal et al. ( 2015 ) to a Broca's network; and Ardila et al. ( 2016 ) proposed a “Broca's complex” including not only left BA44 and BA45, but also BA46, BA47, partially BA6 (mainly its mesial supplementary motor area) and extending subcortically toward the basal ganglia and the thalamus. During the last years, there has been a significant interest in re-analyzing the function of Broca's area in language (e.g., Hagoort, 2005 ; Thompson-Schill, 2005 ; Grodzinky and Amunts, 2006 ; Burns and Fahy, 2010 ). Different proposals have been presented including: binding the elements of the language (Hagoort, 2005 ), selecting information among competing sources (Thompson-Schill, 2005 ), generating/extracting action meanings (Fadiga et al., 2006 ); sequencing motor/expressive elements (Ardila and Bernal, 2007 ); cognitive control mechanism for the syntactic processing of sentences (Novick et al., 2005 ); construction of higher parts of the syntactic tree in speech production (Grodzinsky, 2000 , 2006 ); and verbal working memory (Haverkort, 2005 ). Other authors have suggested that Broca's area subregions might be compatible with the system of prefrontal hierarchical control (Bookheimer, 2002 ). Koechlin and Jubault ( 2006 ) for instance, proposed that the more posterior subregions of Broca's area are preferentially engaged in language tasks based on phonological processing (in which discrete actions must be organized in time), whereas the more anterior regions including BA44, BA45, and BA47 are more precisely involved in tasks based on syntactic and semantic processing, presumably representing a higher organizational hierarchy. Evidently, the cumulative research on the functions of Broca's area is intriguing but has not given a final answer to what is the fundamental function of Broca's area in language processing. In the classical aphasia literature it is assumed that damage in the Broca's area is responsible for the clinical manifestations observed in Broca's aphasia (e.g., Head, 1926 ; Luria, 1947/1970 ; Goldstein, 1948 ; Hécaen, 1972 ; Damasio and Geschwind, 1984 ). Usually, it is assumed that Broca's aphasia includes two major impairments: apraxia of speech and agrammatism (e.g., Hécaen, 1972 ; Luria, 1976 ; Kertesz, 1979 ; Benson and Ardila, 1996 ). Only with the introduction of the CT scan did it become evident that the damage restricted to the Broca's area was not enough to produce the “classical” Broca's aphasia; extension to the insula, lower motor cortex, and subjacent subcortical and periventricular white matter is required (Alexander et al., 1990 ; Benson and Ardila, 1996 ). The mild language disturbance observed in cases of damage of Broca's areas was named “Broca's area aphasia” or “minor Broca's aphasia” or “Broca's aphasia type I (Benson and Ardila, 1996 ). This type of aphasia is characterized by mildly non-fluent speech, relatively short sentences and mild agrammatism. Phonetic deviations, a few phonological paraphasias can be observed (Mohr et al., 1978 ) and some foreign accent can also be noticed (Ardila et al., 1988 ). Noteworthy, brain damage restricted to the Broca's area represents an extremely unusual clinical condition. Beginning with Broca, the overwhelming majority of Broca's aphasia patients present an extended brain damage, significantly exceeding the Broca's area (Broca, 1863 ; Mohr et al., 1978 ; Naeser and Hayward, 1978 ; Kertesz, 1979 ). Dronkers et al. ( 2007 ) using high resolution MR imaging studied the brains of the two initial cases of aphasia reported by Broca, Leborgne and Lelong, and found that both patients' lesions extended significantly into medial regions of the brain, in addition to the surface lesions described by Broca. They concluded that Broca's aphasia is associated to large lesions extending beyond the Broca's area. From the above observations, it can be concluded that Broca's aphasia requires extensive brain lesions. Lesions restricted to Broca's area are associated with just in mild language production defects. Using direct cortical surface recordings in neurosurgical patients it has been reported that during the cued production of words, a sequence of neural events proceeds from word memories in the temporal lobe to the articulatory movements in the motor c
机译:传统上,人们假设语言的产生是由Broca区域控制的,该区域对应于Brodmann区域(BA)44(左半球视镜)(例如,Head,1926年; Luria,1947/1970年; Goldstein,1948年;Hécaen,1972年) ; Damasio和Geschwind,1984年)。自大约20年前以来,人们一直认为BA45(pars triangleis)也是布罗卡地区的一部分(Foundas等,1996)。一些作者提到了更扩展的语言产生系统。 Hagoort(2005,2006)提出存在一个“ Broca's complex”,包括BA44,BA45和BA47。 Lemaire等。 (2013)指Broca的扩展区域; Kadis等。 (2016)转换为表达语言网络; Bernal等。 (2015)到Broca的网络;和Ardila等。 (2016)提出了一个“布鲁克复合体”,不仅包括左BA44和BA45,而且还包括BA46,BA47,部分BA6(主要是其中生辅助运动区),并向皮质下延伸至基底神经节和丘脑。在过去的几年中,人们对重新分析布罗卡地区的语言功能非常感兴趣(例如,Hagoort,2005; Thompson-Schill,2005; Grodzinky and Amunts,2006; Burns and Fahy,2010)。已经提出了不同的建议,包括:绑定语言的要素(Hagoort,2005),在竞争性资源中选择信息(Thompson-Schill,2005),生成/提取动作含义(Fadiga等,2006);对运动/表达元件进行排序(Ardila和Bernal,2007年);句子句法处理的认知控制机制(Novick等,2005);在语音产生中构建语法树的更高部分(Grodzinsky,2000,2006);和言语工作记忆(Haverkort,2005年)。其他作者提出,布罗卡的区域子区域可能与前额叶等级控制系统兼容(Bookheimer,2002)。例如,Koechlin和Jubault(2006)提出,布罗卡地区的较靠后的子区域优先基于语音处理来进行语言任务(必须及时组织离散行动),而较靠前的区域包括BA44,BA45, BA47和BA47更精确地参与基于句法和语义处理的任务,大概代表了更高的组织层次。显然,对布罗卡地区功能的累积研究很有趣,但对于布罗卡地区语言处理的基本功能没有给出最终的答案。在经典的失语症文献中,假设Broca失语症的损害是Broca失语症所观察到的临床表现的原因(例如Head,1926; Luria,1947/1970; Goldstein,1948;Hécaen,1972; Damasio和Geschwind,1984) )。通常认为Broca失语症包括两个主要的障碍:语言失用和语法失语(例如Hécaen,1972; Luria,1976; Kertesz,1979; Benson和Ardila,1996)。只有引入了CT扫描,才发现限制在Broca区域的损伤不足以产生“经典的” Broca失语症。需要延伸至岛突,下运动皮层以及在皮质下和脑室周围的白色物质(Alexander等,1990; Benson和Ardila,1996)。在Broca区域受损的情况下观察到的轻度语言障碍被称为“ Broca区域失语”或“轻微Broca失语”或“ I型Broca失语”(Benson和Ardila,1996年)。这种类型的失语症的特征是轻度不流利的语言,较短的句子和轻度的语文主义。语音上的偏差,可以观察到一些语音上的偏相(Mohr等,1978),也可以注意到一些外来的口音(Ardila等,1988)。值得注意的是,仅限于Broca区域的脑部损伤代表了极为不寻常的临床状况。从布罗卡开始,绝大多数布罗卡失语症患者表现出严重的脑损伤,大大超过了布罗卡区(Broca,1863; Mohr等,1978; Naeser和Hayward,1978; Kertesz,1979)。 Dronkers等。 (2007)使用高分辨率MR成像研究了Broca,Leborgne和Lelong报道的两种失语症的最初病例,发现除皮尔所描述的表面病变外,两名患者的病变均显着扩展到大脑的中部。布罗卡。他们得出的结论是,布罗卡失语症与布罗卡区以外的大病变有关。从上述观察结果可以得出结论,布罗卡氏失语症需要广泛的脑损伤。局限于布罗卡地区的病变仅与轻微的语言缺陷有关。据报道,在神经外科患者中使用直接的皮质表面记录,在提示词产生过程中,一系列神经事件从颞叶的词记忆发展到运动神经的关节运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号