...
首页> 外文期刊>Mediators of inflammation >Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
【24h】

Efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine and azelastine nasal sprays for the treatment of allergic rhinitis

机译:左卡泊汀和氮卓斯汀鼻喷雾剂治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效和耐受性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Levocabastine and azelastine are currently the only antihistamines available as nasal sprays for the topical therapy of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The present study was undertaken to compare the onset of action, efficacy and tolerability of these two agents in a total of 242 patients with this condition. This was an international, multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial with 123 patients treated with levocabastine (0.5 mg/ml, two puffs per nostril twice daily) and 119 with azelastine (1 mg/ml, one puff per nostril twice daily). Onset of action was comparable for the two drugs with over 50% of patients in each group reporting significant symptomatic relief within 30 min of administration of the first dose of study medication. Therapeutic efficacy was also found to be comparable in the two groups with no statistically significant intergroup differences reported for any of the parameters evaluated, although assessments of global therapeutic efficacy revealed a trend favouring levocabastine. Levocabastine appeared to be better tolerated than azelastine (p = 0.06), with the incidence of the most common adverse experiences, application site reactions and taste disturbances, significantly higher on azelastine than with levocabastine (5% versus 1%; p = 0.05 and 5% versus 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, levocabastine nasal spray appears to be at least as effective as, but better tolerated than, azelastine nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
机译:左卡巴汀和氮卓斯汀目前是用于季节性过敏性鼻炎局部治疗的唯一可作为鼻喷雾剂的抗组胺药。本研究旨在比较这两种药物在总共242例这种情况下的起效,疗效和耐受性。这是一项国际性,多中心,开放标签,随机,平行分组的临床试验,研究了123例左旋卡泊汀(0.5 mg / ml,每天两次,每个鼻孔两次)和119例氮卓斯汀(1 mg / ml,每个鼻孔一次)的患者。每天两次)。两种药物的起效相当,每组中超过50%的患者在服用第一剂研究药物后30分钟内报告了明显的症状缓解。还发现两组的治疗效果相当,尽管评估的任何参数均未显示统计学上显着的组间差异,尽管对总体治疗效果的评估显示出有利于左卡泊汀的趋势。左卡巴汀的耐受性似乎优于氮卓斯汀(p = 0.06),最常见的不良反应,应用部位反应和味觉障碍的发生率,氮卓斯汀明显高于左卡泊汀(5%对1%; p = 0.05和5 %与0%; p = 0.01)。综上所述,左卡泊汀鼻喷剂在治疗季节性变应性鼻炎方面似乎至少与氮卓斯汀鼻喷剂一样有效,但耐受性更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号