首页> 外文期刊>Media and Communication >Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation
【24h】

Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation

机译:为什么我们应该继续学习良好(和每天)的参与:类似于政治参与

获取原文
           

摘要

Research on participation is currently characterized by a trend towards studying its “darker” sides. In this commentary, I make an argument for why we should keep studying good participation. In addition, I claim that the flipside of studying exceptional case studies of participation shouldn’t be only focusing on dark participation, but on everyday, mundane forms of participation, that may happen in surprising contexts (such as non-proprietary platforms) and may take different shapes. To make these claims, I introduce a case study of “good participation” in news production processes, and explain why it may merit this distinction. I then use a three-pronged analogy to the cognate field of political participation to show what it can tell us about good—and everyday—participation in the news.
机译:目前,参与研究的特征是研究其“较暗”方面的趋势。在这篇评论中,我提出一个理由,为什么我们应该继续研究良好的参与。此外,我主张研究参与的特殊案例研究的反面不仅应该侧重于暗参与,而且要关注日常的普通参与形式,这可能会在令人惊讶的情况下(例如非专有平台)发生,并且可能采取不同的形状。为了提出这些主张,我介绍了对新闻制作过程中“良好参与”的案例研究,并解释了为什么它值得这种区别。然后,我将三大类比与政治参与的相关领域进行比较,以表明它可以告诉我们关于新闻的良好和日常参与的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号