...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Assessing a Method of Mechanical Cervical Dislocation as a Humane Option for On-Farm Killing using Anesthetized Poults and Young Turkeys.
【24h】

Assessing a Method of Mechanical Cervical Dislocation as a Humane Option for On-Farm Killing using Anesthetized Poults and Young Turkeys.

机译:评估机械性颈椎脱位的方法,作为使用麻醉的家禽和年轻火鸡进行农场杀戮的人道选择。

获取原文

摘要

Our objective was to determine the efficacy of manual cervical dislocation versus a mechanical cervical dislocation device for on-farm killing of poults and young turkeys. Forty-two 1- and 3-week old turkeys were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: awake manual cervical dislocation (CD), anesthetized manual cervical dislocation (aCD) or anesthetized mechanical cervical dislocation (MCD). Anesthetized birds received an intramuscular dose of 0.3 mg/kg medetomidine and 30 mg/kg of ketamine to achieve a light plane of anesthesia. A comparison of CD versus aCD responses indicated that the anesthetic plane did not affect jaw tone or pupillary light reflex, indicators of loss of sensibility and brain death, respectively. MCD was unsuccessful for killing 1-week old poults as indicated by the ongoing presence of the pupillary eye reflex as well as failure to achieve cardiac arrest within 5 minutes in 5 of 5 birds. Radiographs also indicated no vertebral dislocation or fracture. Pupillary light reflex was present in 98% and jaw tone was present in 73% of turkeys, respectively, for all groups combined, but retention of the pupillary light reflex (P<0.001) and jaw tone (P=0.001) was longer for birds killed by MCD. Time to last movement (P=0.797) and cardiac arrest (P=0.057) did not differ between method. Survey radiographs demonstrated an effect of method for the average displacement distance at the site of vertebral dislocation, with a greater distance observed in birds killed by CD compared to MCD (P=0.003). A method by age interaction was observed between CD and MCD for the number of birds with fractures; more vertebral fractures were observed in 3-week old turkeys killed with MCD compared to CD (P=0.047). Upon gross examination, the majority of birds killed by either method had minimal to no hemorrhage within the brain and spinal cord. However, turkeys killed using CD had more microscopic subdural brain hemorrhage (P=0.020). Ante-mortem and post-mortem measures suggest that neither manual CD nor the MCD tool used in this study caused immediate insensibility, but CD resulted in a shorter latency to brain death and fewer fractures compared to MCD.
机译:我们的目标是确定手动颈椎脱位与机械颈椎脱位设备在农场杀死家禽和幼火鸡的功效。将42只1周龄和3周龄的火鸡随机分配到以下三个实验组之一:清醒的人工颈脱位(CD),麻醉的人工颈脱位(aCD)或麻醉的机械性颈脱位(MCD)。麻醉的鸡肌肉注射剂量为0.3 mg / kg的美托咪定和30 mg / kg的氯胺酮,以达到麻醉的效果。 CD与aCD反应的比较表明,麻醉平面不影响下颌音调或瞳孔光反射,分别是敏感性降低和脑死亡的指标。 MCD未能杀死1周龄的家禽,如持续出现的瞳孔眼反射以及5只鸟中的5只在5分钟内未能实现心脏骤停所表明的那样。 X线片也未见椎体脱位或骨折。在所有组合的火鸡中,分别有98%的火鸡有瞳孔光反射,而有73%的火鸡有颌骨音,但是鸟类的瞳孔光反射(P <0.001)和颌骨音(P = 0.001)的保留时间更长被MCD杀死。两种方法的最后运动时间(P = 0.797)和心脏骤停时间(P = 0.057)没有差异。射线照相调查表明,该方法对椎骨脱位部位的平均移位距离有影响,与MCD相比,被CD杀死的鸟类的距离更大(P = 0.003)。在CD和MCD之间观察到了一种通过年龄相互作用的方法来判断有骨折的鸟类的数量。与CD相比,用MCD杀死的3周龄火鸡中观察到更多的椎骨骨折(P = 0.047)。粗略检查后,用这两种方法杀死的大多数禽只的大脑和脊髓内出血很少甚至没有。然而,用CD杀死的火鸡有更多的镜下硬脑膜下大出血(P = 0.020)。事前和事后测量表明,与MCD相比,本研究中使用的手动CD或MCD工具均未引起立即的敏感性,但CD导致的脑死亡潜伏期较短,骨折较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号