...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Farmers’ decision making on livestock trading practices: cowshed culture and behavioural triggers amongst New Zealand dairy farmers
【24h】

Farmers’ decision making on livestock trading practices: cowshed culture and behavioural triggers amongst New Zealand dairy farmers

机译:农民对牲畜贸易行为的决策:新西兰奶农的牛棚文化和行为诱因

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies of farmers’ failure to implement biosecurity practices frequently frame their behaviour as a lack of intention. More recent studies have argued that farmers’ behaviours should be conceptualised as emergent from farming experiences rather than a direct consequence of specific intentions. Drawing on the concepts of ‘cowshed’ culture and the ‘Trigger Change Model’, we explore how farmers’ livestock purchasing behaviour is shaped by farms’ natural and physical environments and identify what triggers behavioural change amongst farmers. Using bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in New Zealand as a case example, qualitative research was conducted with 15 New Zealand dairy producers with varying bTB experiences. We show how farmer’s livestock purchasing behavior evolve with culture under a given farm environment. However, established cultures may be disrupted by various triggers such as disease outbreaks, introductions of animals with undesired characteristics, and farm relocation. While dealing with economic and socio-emotional impacts posed by triggers, farmers reorganise their culture and trading behaviours, which may involve holistic biosecurity strategies. Nevertheless, we also show that these triggers instigate only small behavioural changes for some farmers, suggesting the role of the trigger is likely to be context-dependent. Using voluntary disease control schemes such as providing disease status of source farms has attracted great interest as a driver of behavioural change. One hopes such schemes are easily integrated into existing farm practices, however, we speculate such an integration is challenging for many farmers due to path-dependency. We therefore argue that these schemes may fail to bring their intended behavioural changes without a greater understanding of how different types of triggers work in different situations. We need a paradigm shift in how we frame farmer’s livestock trading practices. Otherwise, we may not able to answer our questions about farm biosecurity if we continue to approaching these questions solely from a biosecurity point of view.
机译:对农民未能实施生物安全措施的研究经常将他们的行为描述为缺乏意图。最近的研究认为,农民的行为应从农业经验中概念化,而不是特定意图的直接后果。利用“耕作”文化和“触发变化模型”的概念,我们探讨了农民的牲畜购买行为是如何受到农场的自然和自然环境影响的,并确定了触发农民行为改变的因素。以新西兰的牛结核病(bTB)为例,对15家具有不同bTB经验的新西兰奶制品生产商进行了定性研究。我们展示了在给定的农场环境下,农民的牲畜购买行为是如何随着文化而演变的。但是,已建立的文化可能会受到各种诱因的破坏,例如疾病暴发,引入具有不良特征的动物以及农场搬迁。在应对触发因素带来的经济和社会情感影响的同时,农民重新组织了文化和贸易行为,其中可能涉及整体生物安全战略。尽管如此,我们还表明,这些触发因素仅对某些农民造成了很小的行为变化,表明该触发因素的作用可能与环境有关。作为行为改变的驱动力,使用自愿疾病控制计划(例如提供源农场的疾病状况)引起了极大的兴趣。有人希望这样的计划可以很容易地整合到现有的农场实践中,但是,我们认为由于路径依赖,这种整合对于许多农民来说是挑战。因此,我们认为,如果没有更好地了解不同类型的触发器在不同情况下如何工作,这些方案可能无法带来预期的行为改变。我们需要在如何设计农民的牲畜贸易实践方面进行范式转变。否则,如果我们仅从生物安全的角度继续解决这些问题,就可能无法回答有关农场生物安全的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号