...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering: Theory, Methods and Applications >Full-Scale Experimental Verification of the Explosion Shock Wave Model of a Natural Gas Pipeline
【24h】

Full-Scale Experimental Verification of the Explosion Shock Wave Model of a Natural Gas Pipeline

机译:天然气管道爆炸冲击波模型的全尺寸实验验证

获取原文
           

摘要

As developments in natural gas pipelines increasingly incorporate higher grades of steel, larger diameters, and higher pressures, the consequences of an accident caused by leakage, explosion, or ignition become progressively more severe. Currently, major technical obstacles include the quantification of the impact of an explosion shock wave of a high-strength, large-diameter natural gas pipeline, and the selection of a reasonable shock wave overpressure model appropriate to the operating conditions. In this paper, six models of shock wave overpressure theories, namely, the TNT equivalent method, the TNO method, the multienergy method, the British Gas method, the Shell method, and the Lee formula, were compared and analyzed to determine their applicability. A shock wave model adapted to the characteristics of a full-scale test was proposed, and the model verification of a full-scale blasting test was conducted on pipelines with diameters of 1422 mm and 1219 mm, respectively. Subsequent results indicated that the modifications to the TNT equivalent and the test parameters correlated with changes in the suitability of the model. Henrych’s formula calculation model of the British Gas method was found to correspond strongly with the measured value, in which the absolute value of the relative error was less than 30% and the absolute error within the range of 78 m to 800 m was no more than 0.05 MPa. Thus, the Henrych formula was adopted as the primary model formula for the shock wave overpressure calculations in this study. To further correct the error of the model, the trend between the curve obtained by the Henrych formula and the fitting curve of the measured value was compared and analyzed. The positive and negative compensations of the shaded area before and after the intersection point were carried out, and the new error correction overpressure model formula was obtained by fitting, with the error controlled within 15%.
机译:随着天然气管道的发展越来越包含更高等级的钢,更大的直径和更高的压力,由泄漏,爆炸或着火引起的事故后果变得越来越严重。当前,主要的技术障碍包括量化高强度大直径天然气管道的爆炸冲击波的影响,以及选择适合于运行条件的合理的冲击波超压模型。本文比较并分析了六种冲击波超压理论模型,即TNT当量法,TNO法,多能法,英国天然气法,Shell法和Lee公式,以确定它们的适用性。提出了适合全尺寸试验特性的冲击波模型,并对直径分别为1422 mm和1219 mm的管道进行了全尺寸爆破试验的模型验证。随后的结果表明,对TNT当量和测试参数的修改与模型适用性的变化相关。发现英国气体方法的亨利克公式计算模型与测量值高度吻合,相对误差的绝对值小于30%,且在78 m至800 m范围内的绝对误差不大于0.05兆帕。因此,在本研究中,采用了Henrych公式作为冲击波超压计算的主要模型公式。为了进一步校正模型的误差,比较了亨利克公式获得的曲线和测量值的拟合曲线之间的趋势。对交点前后的阴影区域进行了正负补偿,并通过拟合得到了新的误差校正超压模型公式,误差控制在15%以内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号