...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >A New Search Method Using Association Rule Mining for Drug-Drug Interaction Based on Spontaneous Report System
【24h】

A New Search Method Using Association Rule Mining for Drug-Drug Interaction Based on Spontaneous Report System

机译:基于自发报告系统的关联规则挖掘用于药物相互作用的新搜索方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Adverse events (AEs) can be caused not only by one drug but also by the interaction between two or more drugs. Therefore, clarifying whether an AE is due to a specific suspect drug or drug-drug interaction (DDI) is useful information for proper use of drugs. Whereas previous reports on the search for drug-induced AEs with signal detection using spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) are numerous, reports on drug interactions are limited. This is because in methods that use “a safety signal indicator” (signal), which is frequently used in pharmacovigilance, a huge number of combinations must be prepared when signal detection is performed, and each risk index must be calculated, which makes interaction search appear unrealistic. Objective: In this paper, we propose association rule mining (AR) using large dataset analysis as an alternative to the conventional methods (additive interaction model (AI) and multiplicative interaction model (MI)). Methods: The data source used was the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. The combination of drugs for which the risk index is detected by the “combination risk ratio (CR)” as the target was assumed to be true data, and the accuracy of signal detection using the AR methods was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, F -score. Results: Our experimental results targeting Stevens-Johnson syndrome indicate that AR has a sensitivity of 99.05%, specificity of 92.60%, Youden's index of 0.917, F -score of 0.876, AI has a sensitivity of 95.62%, specificity of 96.92%, Youden's index of 0.925, and F -score of 0.924, and MI has a sensitivity of 65.46%, specificity of 98.78%, Youden's index of 0.642, and F -score of 0.771. This result was about the same level as or higher than the conventional method. Conclusions: If you use similar calculation methods to create combinations from the database, not only for SJS, but for all AEs, the number of combinations would be so enormous that it would be difficult to perform the calculations. However, in the AR method, the “Apriori algorithm” is used to reduce the number of calculations. Thus, the proposed method has the same detection power as the conventional methods, with the significant advantage that its calculation process is simple.
机译:背景:不良事件(AEs)不仅可以由一种药物引起,而且可以由两种或多种药物之间的相互作用引起。因此,弄清楚AE是否是由于特定的可疑药物或药物相互作用(DDI)引起的,对于正确使用药物是有用的信息。以前有关使用自发报告系统(SRS)进行信号检测以寻找药物诱导的AE的报道很多,但有关药物相互作用的报道却很有限。这是因为在使用经常用于药物警戒的“安全信号指示符”(信号)的方法中,在执行信号检测时必须准备大量的组合,并且必须计算每个风险指数,从而进行交互搜索显得不现实。目的:在本文中,我们提出了使用大型数据集分析来替代常规方法(加性交互模型(AI)和乘性交互模型(MI))的关联规则挖掘(AR)。方法:使用的数据源是日本不良药品事件报告数据库。假设以“组合风险比(CR)”为目标检测出危险指数的药物组合为真实数据,并使用AR方法对信号的检测准确性进行了敏感性,特异性,尤登指数,F得分。结果:我们针对Stevens-Johnson综合征的实验结果表明,AR的敏感性为99.05%,特异性为92.60%,Youden指数为0.917,F得分为0.876,AI的敏感性为95.62%,特异性为96.92%,Youden's指数为0.925,F得分为0.924,MI的敏感性为65.46%,特异性为98.78%,尤登指数为0.642,F得分为0.771。该结果与常规方法大约相同或更高。结论:如果您使用类似的计算方法从数据库中创建组合,不仅对于SJS,对于所有AE,组合的数量将非常庞大,以致于难以进行计算。然而,在AR方法中,“ Apriori算法”用于减少计算数量。因此,所提出的方法具有与常规方法相同的检测能力,其显着优点在于其计算过程简单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号