...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Oncology >Plastic Surgery in the Multimodal Treatment Concept of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Influence of Radiation, Chemotherapy, and Isolated Limb Perfusion on Plastic Surgery Techniques
【24h】

Plastic Surgery in the Multimodal Treatment Concept of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Influence of Radiation, Chemotherapy, and Isolated Limb Perfusion on Plastic Surgery Techniques

机译:软组织肉瘤多模式治疗概念中的整形外科:放射,化学疗法和孤立的肢体灌注对整形外科技术的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Surgical intervention is the mainstay treatment for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). The significance of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiation, and isolated limb perfusion, remains under controversial discussion. The goal of this review is to discuss the effects of the aforementioned treatment modalities and their timing of application in plastic surgery techniques. Furthermore, options of reconstruction in cases of complications caused by adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies are discussed. When compared with adjuvant radiation, neoadjuvant treatment can reduce negative side effects such as fibrosis and edema because radioderma can be removed during the subsequent surgical procedure. Furthermore, there have not been any reports of negative effects of neoadjuvant radiation on microsurgical procedures. However, the dose of neoadjuvant radiation correlates with increased risks of impaired wound healing postoperatively. Thus, a patient-specific approach to decide whether radiation should be performed adjuvant or neoadjuvant is necessary. Preoperative irradiation should be considered in cases where functional structures are exposed after tumor resection, in order to ensure the best possible functionality. Adjuvant radiation should be considered in all other cases because of its known superior wound healing. As for chemotherapy, no negative influence of its use adjuvant or neoadjuvant to reconstructive procedures, such as local or free flaps, has been reported. Lastly, small sample size studies have not shown increased risks of microsurgical failure or wound complications after isolated limb perfusion. The findings of this review suggest that the chronological order of the discussed therapeutic approaches is not a decisive factor in the surgical outcome of reconstructive procedures for STS.
机译:手术干预是软组织肉瘤(STS)的主要治疗手段。辅助疗法和新辅助疗法的重要性,例如化学疗法,放射疗法和孤立的肢体灌注,仍存在争议。本文的目的是讨论上述治疗方式的效果及其在整形外科技术中的应用时机。此外,讨论了由辅助和新辅助疗法引起的并发症的重建方案。与辅助放疗相比,新辅助治疗可以减少诸如纤维化和水肿等不良副作用,因为可以在随后的手术过程中去除放射性皮肤病。此外,还没有关于新辅助放射术对显微外科手术产生负面影响的报道。然而,新辅助放射的剂量与术后伤口愈合受损的风险增加有关。因此,有必要采用一种针对患者的方法来决定是否应进行放疗。在肿瘤切除后暴露功能结构的情况下,应考虑术前照射,以确保最佳的功能。在所有其他情况下,均应考虑辅助放射,因为其已知的伤口愈合良好。至于化学疗法,尚未见到使用佐剂或新佐剂对重建手术(例如局部或游离皮瓣)的负面影响。最后,小样本研究没有显示出孤立的肢体灌注后显微手术失败或伤口并发症的风险增加。这项审查的结果表明,所讨论的治疗方法的时间顺序不是STS重建手术的手术结局的决定性因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号