...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Egalitarian reward contingency in competitive games and primate prefrontal neuronal activity
【24h】

Egalitarian reward contingency in competitive games and primate prefrontal neuronal activity

机译:竞争游戏和灵长类前额神经元活动中的均等奖赏偶然性

获取原文
           

摘要

How people work to obtain a reward depends on the context of the reward delivery, such as the presence/absence of competition and the contingency of reward delivery. Since resources are limited, winning a competition is critically important for organisms' obtaining a reward. People usually expect ordinary performance-reward contingency, with better performers obtaining better rewards. Unordinary reward contingency, such as egalitarianism (equal rewardso-rewards to both good and poor performers), dampens people's motivation. We previously reported that monkeys were more motivated, and neurons in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) showed higher outcome-related activity in a competitive than in a noncompetitive game (Hosokawa and Watanabe, 2012 ). However, monkey's behavior and LPFC neuronal activity have not been examined in a competitive situation with an unordinary performance-reward contingency. Also, the fixed performance-reward contingency in the previous study did not allow us to examine effects of win/loss separately from those of rewardo-reward on prefrontal neuronal activity. Here, we employed the egalitarian competitive situation in which both the winner and loser, or neither of them, got a reward as well as the normal competitive situation in which only the winner got a reward. Monkey's behavioral performance greatly deteriorated in trials with the egalitarian outcome conditions. LPFC neurons showed activities that reflected the normal or egalitarian outcome condition while very few neurons coded win/loss independent of rewardo-reward. Importantly, we found neurons that showed reward-related activity in the normal, but not in the egalitarian outcome conditions, even though the same reward was given to the animal. These results indicate that LPFC may play an important role in monitoring the current reward contingency and integrating it with the performance outcome (win-loss) for better performing the competitive game, and thus for better survival.
机译:人们如何工作以获得奖励取决于奖励交付的背景,例如是否存在竞争以及奖励交付的偶然性。由于资源有限,因此赢得比赛对生物获得奖励至关重要。人们通常期望获得普通的绩效奖励,而绩效更好的人可以获得更好的回报。平等主义之类的非同寻常的奖励偶然性(对表现良好和表现不佳的人给予同等的奖励/不奖励),削弱了人们的动力。我们先前曾报道,猴子具有更大的动力,并且在非竞争性游戏中,前额外侧皮层(LPFC)中的神经元表现出更高的与结果相关的活动(Hosokawa and Watanabe,2012)。然而,在具有非常规表现奖励偶然性的竞争情况下,尚未检查猴子的行为和LPFC神经元活动。同样,在以前的研究中,固定的绩效奖励偶然性使我们无法分别将赢/输与奖励/无奖励对前额神经元活动的影响进行研究。在这里,我们采用了平等竞争的局面,胜利者和失败者(或两者都不获得)以及正常竞争情况下,只有胜利者获得了奖励。在均等结果条件下的试验中,猴子的行为表现大大恶化。 LPFC神经元显示出反映正常或均等结果状态的活动,而很少有神经元独立于奖励/无奖励而编码赢/输。重要的是,我们发现神经元在正常情况下表现出与奖励相关的活动,但在平均结果条件下却没有,即使对动物给予了相同的奖励。这些结果表明,LPFC可能在监视当前奖励意外情况并将其与绩效结果(双赢)整合中发挥重要作用,以更好地执行竞争游戏,从而提高生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号