...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neurology >Role of “Sural Sparing” Pattern (Absent/Abnormal Median and Ulnar with Present Sural SNAP) Compared to Absent/Abnormal Median or Ulnar with Normal Sural SNAP in Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
【24h】

Role of “Sural Sparing” Pattern (Absent/Abnormal Median and Ulnar with Present Sural SNAP) Compared to Absent/Abnormal Median or Ulnar with Normal Sural SNAP in Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

机译:在急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病中,“节余型”模式(中/异常和中性尺骨缺损/异常与目前的正常SNAP相比)的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Sural sparing defined as absent/abnormal median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude or absent/abnormal ulnar SNAP amplitude with a normal sural SNAP amplitude is thought to be a marker for inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies. Objective If sural sparing pattern specifically defined as absent/abnormal median and ulnar SNAP amplitude with normal sural SNAP amplitude (AMUNS) is sensitive and specific when compared with either absent/abnormal median and normal sural (AMNS) or absent/abnormal ulnar and normal sural (AUNS) for acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), select non-diabetic axonopathies (AXPs), and diabetic neuropathies (DNs). Method Retrospective analysis from 2001 to 2010 on all newly diagnosed AIDP, CIDP, select non-diabetic AXP, and DN. Results There were 20 AIDP and 23 CIDP. Twenty AXP and 50 DN patients between 2009 and 2010 were included as controls. AMUNS was seen in 65% of AIDP, 39% CIDP compared with 10% of AXP and 6% for DN with sensitivity of 51%, specificity of 92%, whereas the specificity of AMNS/AUNS was 73% and its sensitivity was 58%. If a patient has AMUNS they are >12 times more likely to have AIDP ( p ?
机译:背景稀疏的定义为无/异常中枢感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)幅度或尺骨SNAP幅度缺失/异常和正常的Sural SNAP幅度被认为是炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病的标志。目的如果与不存在/异常中值和正常sural(AMNS)或不存在/异常尺骨和正常sural相比,专门定义为中位/尺骨SNAP振幅不正常/异常,尺骨SNAP振幅(AMUNS)的surur保留模式是否灵敏且具有特异性(AUNS)用于急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(AIDP),慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP),选择非糖尿病性轴索病(AXPs)和糖尿病性神经病(DNs)。方法对2001年至2010年所有新诊断的AIDP,CIDP,选择的非糖尿病AXP和DN进行回顾性分析。结果有20个AIDP和23个CIDP。纳入2009年至2010年的20名AXP和50名DN患者作为对照。在AIDP的65%,CIDP的39%,AXP的10%和DN的6%中发现AMUNS,敏感性为51%,特异性为92%,而AMNS / AUNS的特异性为73%,敏感性为58% 。如果患者患有AMUNS,则他们患AIDP的可能性要高12倍以上(p 0.001)。结论与AIDP中的AMNS或AUNS相比,保留神经是高度特异性的,但不敏感,但对CIDP的敏感性或特异性却没有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号