...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Diagnostic performance of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting the apicoplast genome for malaria diagnosis in a field setting in sub-Saharan Africa
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting the apicoplast genome for malaria diagnosis in a field setting in sub-Saharan Africa

机译:在撒哈拉以南非洲的田间环境中,针对蚜虫基因组的新型环介导的等温扩增(LAMP)试验对疟疾诊断的诊断性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Background New diagnostic tools to detect reliably and rapidly asymptomatic and low-density malaria infections are needed as their treatment could interrupt transmission. Isothermal amplification techniques are being explored for field diagnosis of malaria. In this study, a novel molecular tool (loop-mediated isothermal amplification—LAMP) targeting the apicoplast genome of Plasmodium falciparum was evaluated for the detection of asymptomatic malaria-infected individuals in a rural setting in The Gambia. Methods A blood was collected from 341 subjects (median age 9 years, range 1–68 years) screened for malaria. On site, a rapid diagnostic test (RDT, SD Bioline Malaria Antigen P.f) was performed, thick blood films (TBF) slides for microscopy were prepared and dry blood spots (DBS) were collected on Whatman ? 903 Specimen collection paper. The TBF and DBS were transported to the field laboratory where microscopy and LAMP testing were performed. The latter was done on DNA extracted from the DBS using a crude (methanol/heating) extraction method. A laboratory-based PCR amplification was done on all the samples using DNA extracted with the Qiagen kit and its results were taken as reference for all the other tests. Results Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence was 37 % (127/341) as detected by LAMP, 30 % (104/341) by microscopy and 37 % (126/341) by RDT. Compared to the reference PCR method, sensitivity was 92 % for LAMP, 78 % for microscopy, and 76 % for RDT; specificity was 97 % for LAMP, 99 % for microscopy, and 88 % for RDT. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in comparison with the reference standard was 0.94 for LAMP, 0.88 for microscopy and 0.81 for RDT. Turn-around time for the entire LAMP assay was approximately 3 h and 30 min for an average of 27 ± 9.5 samples collected per day, compared to a minimum of 10 samples an hour per operator by RDT and over 8 h by microscopy. Conclusion The LAMP assay could produce reliable results the same day of the screening. It could detect a higher proportion of low density malaria infections than the other methods tested and may be used for large campaigns of systematic screening and treatment.
机译:背景技术需要新的诊断工具来可靠,快速地检测无症状和低密度疟疾感染,因为它们的治疗可能会中断传播。正在探索等温扩增技术,以用于疟疾的现场诊断。在这项研究中,针对冈比亚农村地区无症状疟疾感染者的检测,评估了针对恶性疟原虫的质膜基因组的新型分子工具(环介导的等温扩增-LAMP)。方法从341位筛查疟疾的受试者(中位年龄9岁,范围1–68岁)中采集血液。在现场进行了快速诊断测试(RDT,SD Bioline疟疾抗原P.f),制备了用于显微镜检查的厚血膜(TBF)载玻片,并在Whatman上收集了干血斑(DBS)。 903标本收集纸。 TBF和DBS被运送到现场实验室,在那里进行显微镜和LAMP测试。后者是使用粗(甲醇/加热)提取方法从DBS提取的DNA上完成的。使用Qiagen试剂盒提取的DNA对所有样品进行了基于实验室的PCR扩增,并将其结果作为所有其他测试的参考。结果LAMP检测到恶性疟原虫的疟疾患病率为37%(127/341),显微镜下检测为30%(104/341),RDT检测为37%(126/341)。与参考PCR方法相比,LAMP的灵敏度为92%,显微镜的灵敏度为78%,RDT的灵敏度为76%。 LAMP的特异性为97%,显微镜检查的特异性为99%,RDT的特异性为88%。与参考标准相比,接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线下的面积对于LAMP为0.94,对于显微镜为0.88,对于RDT为0.81。整个LAMP分析的周转时间约为3小时和30分钟,每天平均收集27±9.5个样品,相比之下,RDT每个操作员每小时至少要收集10个样品,而显微镜检查则需要8小时以上。结论LAMP检测可以在筛选的当天产生可靠的结果。它可以检测到比其他测试方法更高比例的低密度疟疾感染,并且可以用于大规模的系统筛查和治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号