...
首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >Are insecticide-treated bednets more protective against Plasmodium falciparum than Plasmodium vivax-infected mosquitoes?
【24h】

Are insecticide-treated bednets more protective against Plasmodium falciparum than Plasmodium vivax-infected mosquitoes?

机译:经过杀虫剂处理的蚊帐是否比间日疟原虫感染的蚊子更能抵抗恶性疟原虫?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The outcomes of insecticide-treated bednet (ITN) interventions for malaria control in Papua New Guinea tend to suggest a differential protective effect against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Little is known about the impact of ITNs on the relative abundance of mosquitoes infected with either P. falciparum or P. vivax. This paper describes the biting cycle of P. falciparum and P. vivax-infected mosquitoes and the impact of an ITN intervention on the proportion of mosquitoes infected with either parasite species. Methods Entomological investigations were performed in East Sepik (ESP) and New Ireland Provinces (NIP) of PNG. Mosquitoes were collected using the all-night (18:00 - 06:00) landing catch and CDC light-trap methods and species specific malaria sporozoite rates were determined by ELISA. Results and discussion The distribution of sporozoite positive mosquitoes in three four-hour periods (18:00-22:00, 22:00-02:00 & 02:00-06:00) showed that a higher proportion of P. vivax-infected mosquitoes were biting before people retired to bed under the protection of bednets. In the intervention village, the 308 mosquitoes collected before ITNs were introduced included eight (2.0%) P. falciparum-positive and four (1.0%) P. vivax-positive specimens, giving a parasite ratio of 2:1. The sporozoite rate determined from 908 mosquitoes caught after ITNs were introduced showed a significant decrease for P. falciparum (0.7%) and a slight increase for P. vivax (1.3%), resulting in a post intervention parasite ratio of 1:2. In the East Sepik Province, where ITNs were not used, P. falciparum remained the dominant species in 12 monthly mosquito collections and monthly P. falciparum:P. vivax formula varied from 8:1 to 1.2:1. Conclusion These findings suggest that people sleeping under treated bednets may be more exposed to P. vivax than P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes before going to sleep under the protection of bednets. This difference in the biting behaviour of mosquitoes infected with different malaria parasites may partly explain the change in the P. falciparum:P. vivax formula after the introduction of ITNs.
机译:背景在巴布亚新几内亚,用杀虫剂处理过的蚊帐(ITN)进行疟疾控制的干预措施的结果往往表明,对恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫具有不同的保护作用。关于ITN对感染恶性疟原虫或间日疟原虫的蚊子相对丰度的影响知之甚少。本文介绍了恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫感染的蚊子的叮咬周期,以及ITN干预对两种寄生虫感染的蚊子比例的影响。方法在PNG的东塞皮克(ESP)和新爱尔兰省(NIP)进行昆虫学调查。使用整夜(18:00-06:00)着陆捕获和CDC诱捕方法收集蚊子,并通过ELISA测定物种特异性疟疾子孢子的发生率。结果与讨论在三个四个小时的时段(18:00-22:00、22:00-02:00和02:00-06:00),子孢子阳性蚊子的分布表明,间日疟原虫的比例较高。在蚊帐保护下,人们在退休前就被蚊子咬了。在干预村,引入ITN之前收集的308只蚊子包括八(2.0%)恶性疟原虫阳性和四(1.0%)间日疟原虫阳性标本,寄生虫比率为2:1。从引入ITN后捕获的908只蚊子中确定的子孢子率显示,恶性疟原虫明显减少(0.7%),间日疟原虫轻微增加(1.3%),导致干预后寄生虫比率为1:2。在不使用ITN的东塞皮克省,恶性疟原虫仍然是12个每月蚊帐和恶性疟原虫:P的主要物种。 vivax配方从8:1到1.2:1不等。结论这些发现表明,在蚊帐保护下入睡前,在经过处理的蚊帐下睡觉的人可能比经恶性疟原虫感染的蚊子更暴露于间日疟原虫。感染了不同疟疾寄生虫的蚊子在咬人行为上的差异可能部分解释了恶性疟原虫:P。引入ITN后的vivax公式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号