首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience >Effect of Cognitive Demand on Functional Visual Field Performance in Senior Drivers with Glaucoma
【24h】

Effect of Cognitive Demand on Functional Visual Field Performance in Senior Drivers with Glaucoma

机译:认知需求对青光眼高级驾驶员功能视野性能的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the effect of cognitive demand on functional visual field performance in drivers with glaucoma. Method: This study included 20 drivers with open-angle glaucoma and 13 age- and sex-matched controls. Visual field performance was evaluated under different degrees of cognitive demand: a static visual field condition (C1), dynamic visual field condition (C2), and dynamic visual field condition with active driving (C3) using an interactive, desktop driving simulator. The number of correct responses (accuracy) and response times on the visual field task were compared between groups and between conditions using Kruskal–Wallis tests. General linear models were employed to compare cognitive workload, recorded in real-time through pupillometry, between groups and conditions. Results: Adding cognitive demand (C2 and C3) to the static visual field test (C1) adversely affected accuracy and response times, in both groups ( p < 0.05). However, drivers with glaucoma performed worse than did control drivers when the static condition changed to a dynamic condition [C2 vs. C1 accuracy; glaucoma: median difference (Q1–Q3) 3 (2–6.50) vs. controls: 2 (0.50–2.50); p = 0.05] and to a dynamic condition with active driving [C3 vs. C1 accuracy; glaucoma: 2 (2–6) vs. controls: 1 (0.50–2); p = 0.02]. Overall, drivers with glaucoma exhibited greater cognitive workload than controls ( p = 0.02). Conclusion: Cognitive demand disproportionately affects functional visual field performance in drivers with glaucoma. Our results may inform the development of a performance-based visual field test for drivers with glaucoma.
机译:目的:研究认知需求对青光眼驾驶员功能性视野性能的影响。方法:这项研究包括20位开角型青光眼驾驶员和13位年龄和性别相匹配的对照。使用交互式桌面驾驶模拟器在不同程度的认知需求下评估视野性能:静态视野条件(C1),动态视野条件(C2)和主动驾驶的动态视野条件(C3)。使用Kruskal–Wallis检验比较了两组之间以及条件之间在视野任务上正确回答的数量(准确性)和响应时间。使用一般线性模型比较各组和各种情况之间通过瞳孔测量法实时记录的认知工作量。结果:在静态视野测试(C1)中增加认知需求(C2和C3)对两组的准确性和响应时间均产生不利影响(p <0.05)。但是,当静态条件变为动态条件时,青光眼驾驶员的表现比对照驾驶员差[C2 vs. C1准确度;青光眼:中位差异(Q1-Q3)3(2-6.50)vs.对照:2(0.50-2.50); p = 0.05]并在主动驱动下达到动态条件[C3 vs. C1精度;青光眼:2(2–6)vs对照:1(0.50–2); p = 0.02]。总体而言,青光眼驾驶员表现出比对照组更大的认知负荷(p = 0.02)。结论:认知需求对青光眼驾驶员功能性视野性能的影响不成比例。我们的结果可能为青光眼驾驶员基于性能的视野测试的发展提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号